Search FCW


Subscribe Now!
Table of Contents
Sprint
Business
BPM
CXOs
Columns
Columnists
Defense
E-Government
Elections 2008
Enterprise Architecture
Funding
Homeland Security
Health IT
IPv6
LOB
Management
Procurement
Privacy
Policy
Program Management
State and Local
Security
Technology
Telework
Training and Certification
Workforce

More Topics
resourcecenter
Home
Letters to the Editor
Current Issue/Download
Print/Online Archives
Editorial Calendar
researchstore
resourcecenter
Communications for Continuity Operations

Oracle Resource Center
NEW! Transforming Data Center
Managed Services
Service Oriented Architecture
Training & Simulation
Networking Communications
Security Directives and Compliance
Data Center Virtualization
Air Force ELSG Contract Guide

More >>



Latest News
ADVERTISEMENT





 

Taking stock two years later

By John Moore
Published on November 30, 2003

Comment

Click here to comment on this article


Newsletters

You might also be interested in these FCW newsletters:

Daily
Homeland Security

To learn more, click here.


Disciplined investment

Although funding for homeland security projects is starting to flow, no one is calling it a torrent.

And that may be a good thing, according to some observers.

"We need to fund for a long war," said James Carafano, senior research fellow at the Heritage Foundation. "Rushing out and spending a lot of money on defense measures — when you don't have a good plan for that — is not only wasteful, it's counterproductive."

The government's homeland security spending should rest on "a clear set of priorities based on standards, so we spend the money on the right thing," he added.


After the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks, the United States embarked on a complex task: protecting an open society of 292 million people living in a nation with more than 200 ports of entry and 7,500 miles of borders.

And doing it in a way that does not unduly interfere with the free flow of ideas, people and commerce.

And devising terrorism prevention and response programs that not only work today but can also meet changing threats in a long-term effort.

The federal government is backing a multitude of domestic defense initiatives, many of which rely on information technology. The Homeland Security Department, created in November 2002, received $37 billion for fiscal 2003 and has a similar budget for this fiscal year.

Homeland security spending is the subject of much discussion among think tanks, industry groups, emergency responders and government officials. Whether the money spent on homeland security is sufficient, inadequate or overkill is an important question that's difficult to answer. Some homeland security initiatives have recently commenced, but others won't be fully deployed for years.

James Carafano, senior research fellow at the Heritage Foundation, likens the war on terrorism to the Cold War, in which the tools for addressing the conflict evolved over several years of trial and error. "That is the period we are in right now," he said.

The following sections assess IT-oriented homeland security efforts in six areas: entry/exit monitoring, transportation, emergency response, bioterrorism, critical infrastructure protection and business continuity. Investments in those fields are recent, and progress may be uneven at times, observers say.

Entry/exit system: High visibility, tight budget

The ability to screen people who enter the country is an important line of defense.

"The most important thing we can do in terms of homeland security is to make sure terrorists don't get into the country," said Charles Pena, director of defense policy studies at the Cato Institute. "All the hijackers on [Sept. 11, 2001,] came into the country through legal means. If you keep the bad guys out, you will have gone a long way toward protecting the homeland even if you do nothing else."



upcoming event

Green Computing Summit, Ronald Reagan Building, Washington, DC
December 2 - December 3, 2008

Trusted Internet Connection and the Comprehensive National Cyber Security Initiative, The Willard Intercontinental Hotel, Washington, DC
December 4, 2008


 

head
fcw
issue
First Name State
Last Name Zip
Title Email