Search FCW


Subscribe Now!
Table of Contents
Sprint
Business
BPM
CXOs
Columns
Columnists
Defense
E-Government
Elections 2008
Enterprise Architecture
Funding
Homeland Security
Health IT
IPv6
LOB
Management
Procurement
Privacy
Policy
Program Management
State and Local
Security
Technology
Telework
Training and Certification
Workforce

More Topics
resourcecenter
Home
Letters to the Editor
Current Issue/Download
Print/Online Archives
Editorial Calendar
researchstore
resourcecenter
Communications for Continuity Operations

Oracle Resource Center
NEW! Transforming Data Center
Managed Services
Service Oriented Architecture
Training & Simulation
Networking Communications
Security Directives and Compliance
Data Center Virtualization
Air Force ELSG Contract Guide

More >>



Latest News
ADVERTISEMENT





 

OMB: E-signatures a must

By William Matthews
Published on May 8, 2000

Comment

Click here to comment on this article


Newsletters

You might also be interested in these FCW newsletters:

Daily

To learn more, click here.


The agency that is leading the way to electronic government says "digital signatures" that encrypt documents and messages probably offer the best assurance of privacy when citizens deal with government agencies online.

Officially, the Office of Management and Budget said it is remaining neutral on the question of how best to ensure privacy and authenticity in electronic transactions with the government.

But in guidance to agencies May 2, OMB officials said, "we recognize that cryptographically-based digital signatures hold great promise for ensuring both authentication and privacy in networked interactions."

And digital signatures "may be the only technology available that can foster interoperability across numerous applications," they wrote in the guidance, which instructs agencies on how to begin complying with the Government Paperwork Elimination Act.

The act, which was passed in 1998, required federal agencies by Oct. 21, 2003, to provide people and organizations with the option of dealing with the government electronically instead of on paper.

Among the central concerns with electronic transactions, however, are privacy and assurance that documents have not been altered.

A number of agencies have used less sophisticated methods to assure privacy and authenticity. For example, the Internal Revenue Service and the Securities and Exchange Commission have used personal identification numbers, or PINs, to provide privacy for companies and individuals submitting regulatory filings and tax data. But both agencies plan eventually to adopt digital signatures, OMB said.

The digital signature option OMB favors is public-key infrastructure. It actually involves two keys — a private one used for encrypting messages and documents, and a public one for unencrypting them. The private key is available only to the document's author. The public key is available to document recipients and enables them to unencrypt and read the document, but not change it.

"Properly implemented electronic signature technologies can offer degrees of confidence in authenticating identity that are greater than a handwritten signature can offer," OMB said.

Many policy details must be worked out before public-key technology can be widely put in place, however. For example, how is the private key to be linked to its holder? It could be through biometrics, such as a fingerprint, voice print or retina scan. Or it could be embedded in a smart card or software.


upcoming event

Green Computing Summit, Ronald Reagan Building, Washington, DC
December 2 - December 3, 2008

Trusted Internet Connection and the Comprehensive National Cyber Security Initiative, The Willard Intercontinental Hotel, Washington, DC
December 4, 2008


 

head
fcw
issue
First Name State
Last Name Zip
Title Email