Homeland Security Department Secretary Michael Chertoff is giving the agencys chief information officer control over more than $4 billion in information technology spending, and adding sweeping authority to the CIOs office.
Under a management directive released last week, DHS CIO Scott Charbo will gain authority over budget planning and project approval for the component agencies technology shops. He also will receive authority over the hiring, performance evaluations and pay of the component CIOs, Chertoff announced in a March 15 speech to the Northern Virginia Technology Council.
Chertoffs decision to assign centralized IT budget authority drew praise from critical department constituencies and follows a continuing trend among the most troubled federal agencies.
Sen. Susan Collins (R-Maine), ranking member on the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee, stated in an e-mail message that she hopes the CIOs expanded authority will provide better continuity in the departments IT programs and assist in the development of departmentwide systems that will help DHS operate more effectively and efficiently.
Charbo joins Department of Veterans Affairs CIO Bob Howard in obtaining budget authority. Congress gave Howard control over IT spending last year in a bill to reorganize the VA.
Many experts in and out of government have continually called for CIOs to have budget authority, yet few do. But there is a growing momentum for CIOs to gain spending power.
The most direct reflection of public policy is money, said Bob Woods, a former General Services Administration official and president of Topside Consulting, at a recent conference. If you have money you can influence what happens. If not, you can just persuade.
However, Karen Evans, the Office of Management and Budgets administrator for e-government and IT, countered that CIOs already have responsibility to manage technology investments, no matter if they have budget authority.
Its about time At VA, the dog has caught the car, Evans said at the same conference. We will see how it plays out.
Chertoff seemed to recognize the limitations and challenges Evans mentioned. In a department of our size and complexity, and particularly in a department built from a lot of legacy agencies, this unification and strengthening of core management will not be easy, he said. Some of the components will not be used to this level of centralized coordination, particularly as it relates to IT systems.