Search FCW


Subscribe Now!
Table of Contents
Sprint
Business
BPM
CXOs
Columns
Columnists
Defense
E-Government
Elections 2008
Enterprise Architecture
Funding
Homeland Security
Health IT
IPv6
LOB
Management
Procurement
Privacy
Policy
Program Management
State and Local
Security
Technology
Telework
Training and Certification
Workforce

More Topics
resourcecenter
Home
Letters to the Editor
Current Issue/Download
Print/Online Archives
Editorial Calendar
researchstore
resourcecenter
Communications for Continuity Operations

Oracle Resource Center
Networking Communications
Security Directives and Compliance
Data Center Virtualization
Air Force ELSG Contract Guide
Security Management
DOD and Security Guide
Networx Contract Guide
SEWP IV Contract Guide
Priority Report: Virtualization
Priority Report: Networking Services

More >>



Latest News
ADVERTISEMENT





 

Editorial: Information sharing

The government should tap industry knowledge, but it must also be wary of ethical concerns

By Christopher J. Dorobek
Published on May 14, 2007

Comment

Click here to comment on this article


Related story links

Read more editorials

Read FCW columns


Newsletters

You might also be interested in these FCW newsletters:

Daily

To learn more, click here.


As ethics debates reach a high pitch, the revolving door between government and industry has become a major concern of many public interest groups.

The worry is that as people move back and forth between the public and private sectors, they become caught up in conflicts of interest and abandon the public good in favor of helping boost contractor profits. Vice President Dick Cheney and Halliburton’s Iraq contracts are prime examples for those concerned about the revolving door, but there are others.

There is a difference between most people in government and industry and people who work for organizations that identify themselves as public interest groups. Why? Because those on the front lines know that government programs can’t succeed if government and industry don’t share information.

The long-term solution, of course, is to make government an employer of choice. But that would require significant changes, not the least of which is making government salaries competitive.

By many measures, the revolving door is good for government. It forces government and industry to walk in one another’s shoes. Government officials can experience firsthand the challenges facing government contractors, and industry officials can see close-up how federal agencies operate.

Rep. Tom Davis (R-Va.), ranking member of the Oversight and Government Reform Committee, incorporated a public/private exchange program in the Services Acquisition Reform Act. That program formalizes the exchange of ideas between government and industry by allowing a temporary exchange of high-performing acquisition professionals among participating federal agencies and private-sector entities.

We tend to agree with the Government Accountability Office, which said the exchange program lets agencies benefit from private-sector knowledge and expertise. But we believe that idea exchanges also help contractors understand agency concerns and challenges and enable them to support agencies more effectively.

Any program that fosters more conversations between government and industry will benefit agencies as they tackle complex problems. Federal agencies face many difficult and critical challenges, and they must be able to tap the expertise of the best and the brightest, whether those people are in the public or private sectors.

cartoon


upcoming event

Transition 2009, Four Points Sheraton, Washington, DC
October 15, 2008

GCN Awards Gala, Hilton Washington in Washington, D.C.
October 22, 2008


 

head
fcw
issue
First Name State
Last Name Zip
Title Email