Search FCW


Subscribe Now!
Table of Contents
Business
BPM
CXOs
Columns
Columnists
Defense
E-Government
Elections 2008
Enterprise Architecture
Funding
Homeland Security
Health IT
IPv6
LOB
Management
Procurement
Privacy
Policy
Program Management
State and Local
Security
Technology
Telework
Workforce

More Topics
resourcecenter
Home
Letters to the Editor
Current Issue/Download
Print/Online Archives
Editorial Calendar
researchstore
resourcecenter
Sprint Communications for Continuity Operations
Oracle Resource Center
GSA: Your Customer Service Agency
Government Leadership Survey
Green Solutions Guide
Report: Information Sharing
DISA IT Strategy & Vision
Emergency Preparedness Report
Report: Green Computing
PEO EIS Guidebook
Content Library

More >>



Latest News
ADVERTISEMENT





 

Editorial: A missed opportunity

By Christopher J. Dorobek
Published on April 16, 2007

Comment

Click here to comment on this article


Related story links

Read FCW editorials

Read FCW columns


Newsletters

You might also be interested in these FCW newsletters:

Daily

To learn more, click here.


It has been several weeks since Lurita Doan, the administrator of the General Services Administration, testified before the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee. In hindsight, the lingering question is: What did it all mean — and what does it mean for government procurement and good government?

Unfortunately, when all is said and done, it means very little. The spectacle that took place late last month was a missed opportunity.
The government procurement community faces serious issues — issues that need to be debated. But neither Doan nor the committee members used the session as an opportunity to address those issues and help the government take steps that would result in more effective, better-run organizations.

One example: Oversight.

An important issue in government procurement is the role of oversight, particularly the relationships among procurement officials, auditors, inspectors general and congressional overseers. Those relationships are strained — at best.

Nobody is suggesting that there should be no oversight. We are not. Most procurement executives appreciate an environment in which they can learn ways to improve how they do their work. And if there is waste, fraud and abuse, people should be prosecuted — as they have been.

But a perception among the procurement workforce is that just about any decision they make can be reviewed and re-reviewed — over and over again. Another perception among procurement employees is that mistakes are not tolerated. Those workers fear having their mistakes plastered on the front pages of newspapers and aired in congressional hearings. We don’t believe that is the desire of the overseers — lawmakers or IGs.

The Doan hearing could have presented an opportunity to have a debate about what the role of oversight should be, which procurement activities need reforming or how agencies should go about determining what government work is eligible for competition.

That discussion probably would not have made headlines in mainstream newspapers, but it would have started a conversation about important issues and moved us a step closer to more effective government operations, which we believe is everybody’s goal.

Unfortunately, on that issue and other important topics, the Doan hearing was a missed opportunity.

chart


upcoming event

Enterprise Architecture 2008 - Washington, DC
September 9 - September 10, 2008

Occupational Health & Safety Executive Summit - Arlington, VA
October 6 - October 7, 2008


 

head
fcw
issue
First Name State
Last Name Zip
Title Email