Search FCW


Subscribe Now!
Table of Contents
Sprint
Business
BPM
CXOs
Columns
Columnists
Defense
E-Government
Elections 2008
Enterprise Architecture
Funding
Homeland Security
Health IT
IPv6
LOB
Management
Procurement
Privacy
Policy
Program Management
State and Local
Security
Technology
Telework
Training and Certification
Workforce

More Topics
resourcecenter
Home
Letters to the Editor
Current Issue/Download
Print/Online Archives
Editorial Calendar
researchstore
resourcecenter
Communications for Continuity Operations

Oracle Resource Center
NEW! Transforming Data Center
Managed Services
Service Oriented Architecture
Training & Simulation
Networking Communications
Security Directives and Compliance
Data Center Virtualization
Air Force ELSG Contract Guide

More >>



Latest News
ADVERTISEMENT





 

CIOs want the power of the purse

Most federal CIOs do not decide how to spend their IT budgets

By Judi Hasson
Published on January 9, 2006

Comment

Click here to comment on this article


Newsletters

You might also be interested in these FCW newsletters:

Daily

To learn more, click here.


When Robert McFarland became the Department of Veterans Affairs' chief information officer, he asked, "Where's the budget?" The response was one of the biggest surprises of his professional life.

Contrary to what the former Dell executive had experienced in the private sector, the VA's CIO had no control over the VA's $1.2 billion information technology budget. Spending was decentralized, and no one was watching the entire picture to monitor how efficiently the IT department made investments.

"When it's been distributed in the past, it has been harder to track," McFarland said. "It was difficult to account for what you spend and what you've been authorized to spend."

All that changed last fall when VA Secretary James Nicholson decided to centralize budget authority at the CIO's office. At the same time, Congress approved a measure to put the power of the purse in McFarland's hands, and President Bush signed it into law.

"The department has annually spent billions of dollars without accountability or measurable performance outcomes on IT modernization," said Rep. Steve Buyer (R-Ind.), chairman of the House Veterans Affairs' Committee and the measure's sponsor.

The Clinger-Cohen Act of 1996 established a CIO office at every federal agency but didn't include a specific provision for who controls the money. The reason was simple, according to sources who helped draft the legislation. Federal chief financial officers opposed giving the spending power to CIOs. This impasse has weakened the office at many federal agencies.

"Congress would have loved to add more authorities -- including budget authority -- for the CIOs," said Drew Crockett, deputy communications director for the Government Reform Committee. "However, since Clinger-Cohen was such a huge burden to pass, members at the time never thought they could get more. Budget authority for CIOs has been discussed on and off for years, and we continue to explore ways to expand the CIO function."

Although some federal agencies provide spending controls at the CIO level, many do not. This hodgepodge of policies has created a variety of difficulties for CIOs.

"Of course, it helps to have budget authority," wrote Vance Hitch, the Justice Department's CIO, in an e-mail. "It is an important factor in impacting IT initiatives. It allows you to have more direct influence and control over the success of the initiatives."



upcoming event

Green Computing Summit, Ronald Reagan Building, Washington, DC
December 2 - December 3, 2008

Trusted Internet Connection and the Comprehensive National Cyber Security Initiative, The Willard Intercontinental Hotel, Washington, DC
December 4, 2008


 

head
fcw
issue
First Name State
Last Name Zip
Title Email