Search FCW


Subscribe Now!
Table of Contents
Sprint
Business
BPM
CXOs
Columns
Columnists
Defense
E-Government
Elections 2008
Enterprise Architecture
Funding
Homeland Security
Health IT
IPv6
LOB
Management
Procurement
Privacy
Policy
Program Management
State and Local
Security
Technology
Telework
Training and Certification
Workforce

More Topics
resourcecenter
Home
Letters to the Editor
Current Issue/Download
Print/Online Archives
Editorial Calendar
researchstore
resourcecenter
Communications for Continuity Operations

Oracle Resource Center
NEW! Transforming Data Center
Managed Services
Service Oriented Architecture
Training & Simulation
Networking Communications
Security Directives and Compliance
Data Center Virtualization
Air Force ELSG Contract Guide

More >>



Latest News
ADVERTISEMENT





 

Poor patent process hurts innovation, ITAA says

By FCW Staff
Published on March 30, 2007

Comment

Click here to comment on this article


Newsletters

You might also be interested in these FCW newsletters:

Daily

To learn more, click here.


The Information Technology Association of America warned Congress March 29 that the U.S. patent system is broken and needs to be fixed because inefficiencies, poor-quality patents and the high risks of litigation are keeping America’s small businesses from realizing their innovative potential.

“The current system, in my view, leaves small business in a position where we are afraid to innovate,” said Mitchell Gross, chairman and CEO of Mobius Management Systems Inc., and a member of the board of ITAA’s IT Services division.

Gross called for additional scrutiny of patents and a more balanced approach to enforcement. Those “are the prices we have to pay to sustain a viable and useful patent system,” he said.

Gross told the House Small Business Committee that the process for issuing patents is too expensive, takes too long and frequently results in questionable patents that lend themselves to challenges in court.

In court, he added, the system is so tilted to the plaintiff/patentee’s advantage that defendants are forced to settle, regardless of the merits of their defense or the weakness of the patent underlying the plaintiff’s claims.

In written testimony, Gross said that if he had to characterize the problem in a few words, he might say “too much risk of losing a fight when a bad patent stands up against innovation.”

He characterized a bad patent as one that is overly broad in its coverage and often covers a process that usually does not seem very novel. “I think the problem may be particularly acute in the software and IT services industry,” he said.

Gross said it is important to have a viable, low cost administrative process for reviewing patents that are already issued, to see if the claims of validity hold up when challenged, without having to go to court.

“Of course, it is not the fact of overbroad patents that matters; it is the consequence of infringement that weighs most heavily in the equation,” he said. “And right now, the risk of very high damages or of exorbitant settlement requests is, to my mind, very real.”

ITAA has about 325 corporate members ranging in size from small IT start-ups to industry leaders throughout the United States. The organization is also secretariat of the World Information Technology and Services Alliance, a global network of 67 countries'  IT associations.

Hubler is a staff writer for Washington Technology, an 1105 Government Information Group publication.



upcoming event

Green Computing Summit, Ronald Reagan Building, Washington, DC
December 2 - December 3, 2008

Trusted Internet Connection and the Comprehensive National Cyber Security Initiative, The Willard Intercontinental Hotel, Washington, DC
December 4, 2008


 

head
fcw
issue
First Name State
Last Name Zip
Title Email