Search FCW


Subscribe Now!
Table of Contents
Sprint
Business
BPM
CXOs
Columns
Columnists
Defense
E-Government
Elections 2008
Enterprise Architecture
Funding
Homeland Security
Health IT
IPv6
LOB
Management
Procurement
Privacy
Policy
Program Management
State and Local
Security
Technology
Telework
Training and Certification
Workforce

More Topics
resourcecenter
Home
Letters to the Editor
Current Issue/Download
Print/Online Archives
Editorial Calendar
researchstore
resourcecenter
Communications for Continuity Operations

Oracle Resource Center
NEW - Data Center Virtualization
NEW - Air Force ELSG Contract Guide
NEW - Security Management
NEW - DOD and Security Guide
Networx Contract Guide
SEWP IV Contract Guide
Priority Report: Virtualization
NEW - CHESS formerly ASCP
New - SATCOM II

More >>



Latest News
ADVERTISEMENT





 

GAO: DHS still behind on US-VISIT program

By Brian Robinson
Published on March 21, 2007

Comment

Click here to comment on this article


Related story links

GAO: US-VISIT still needs work

US-VISIT CIO resigns

US-VISIT under the microscope


Newsletters

You might also be interested in these FCW newsletters:

Daily

To learn more, click here.


Despite making some progress, the U.S. Visitor and Immigrant Status Indicator Technology (US-VISIT) program still faces considerable technology and management problems, according to an official of the Government Accountability Office.

Richard Stana, GAO’s director of homeland security and justice issues, told the House Homeland Security Committee March 20 that fundamental questions persist about the program’s direction, how US-VISIT fits into the larger context of other homeland security programs and what the ultimate return on investment will be.

Also, he said, the program is overdue in establishing a way to ensure it is going after the right US-VISIT solution, and the program is managing it in the right way.

“The longer the program proceeds without these, the greater the risk that the program will not optimally support mission operations and will fall short of commitments,” Stana said.

On the positive side, he noted, a US-VISIT biometric entry screening capability is now operating at 115 airports, 14 seaports and 154 land points of entry.

However, Stana said, management controls are insufficient to identify and evaluate computer and other operational problems at land points of entry. The controls in place were inconsistently administered, he added.

Also, although US-VISIT has conducted various exit demonstration projects, there is no operational biometric exit capability.

As required by law, the Homeland Security Department should have reported to Congress by June 2005 on how it intended to implement a comprehensive, biometric entry/exit program, but DHS still hasn’t done so, Stana said.

DHS needs to establish critical acquisition management processes so that US-VISIT meets its goals on time and within budget, he said, and that requires effective project planning, requirements management and financial management.

Despite several years of detailed criticism, Stana told the committee  that DHS has yet to adequately tackle these issues, and until it does, “the risk of US-VISIT continuing to fall short of expectations is increased.”


upcoming event

Enterprise Architecture 2008 - Washington, DC
September 9 - September 10, 2008

Occupational Health & Safety Executive Summit - Arlington, VA
October 6 - October 7, 2008


 

head
fcw
issue
First Name State
Last Name Zip
Title Email