Search FCW


Subscribe Now!
Table of Contents
Sprint
Business
BPM
CXOs
Columns
Columnists
Defense
E-Government
Elections 2008
Enterprise Architecture
Funding
Homeland Security
Health IT
IPv6
LOB
Management
Procurement
Privacy
Policy
Program Management
State and Local
Security
Technology
Telework
Training and Certification
Workforce

More Topics
resourcecenter
Home
Letters to the Editor
Current Issue/Download
Print/Online Archives
Editorial Calendar
researchstore
resourcecenter
Communications for Continuity Operations

Oracle Resource Center
NEW! Transforming Data Center
Managed Services
Service Oriented Architecture
Training & Simulation
Networking Communications
Security Directives and Compliance
Data Center Virtualization
Air Force ELSG Contract Guide

More >>



Latest News
ADVERTISEMENT





 

Foreign groups target defense tech

By Josh Rogin
Published on January 4, 2007

Comment

Click here to comment on this article


Related story links

DOD battles spear phishing

Network attack disables Naval War College

China a major cyberthreat, commission warns

Air Force to create Cyber Command


Newsletters

You might also be interested in these FCW newsletters:

Daily

To learn more, click here.


Government-affiliated institutions in foreign countries are targeting the U.S. defense industry in order to steal sensitive technology at record levels, according to a Defense Department report.

Internet-based attempts to acquire classified intelligence and information from cleared contractors also rose sharply in 2005.

Direct foreign government targeting of the U.S. contracting sector rose slightly compared to 2004. But attempts nearly doubled originating from government-affiliated entities, such as research institutes, laboratories, government-funded universities and companies with strong ties to foreign governments.

The revelations came in the unclassified version of an annual report issued recently by the Defense Security Service’s counterterrorism office. The report was titled “Technology Collection Trends in the U.S. Defense Industry.”

Globalization of the defense industry and increasing cooperation with foreign firms and organizations are exacerbating the security challenge, the report stated.

“Foreign entities will likely use ostensibly legitimate business to target and exploit U.S. firms that develop sensitive technologies,” the report states. “Many countries already deem it in to be in their national interest to acquire any and all U.S. military and dual-use technology.”

Foreign entities used a combination of high-tech and traditional methods last year to gather intelligence from employees of defense contractors. In one example, a female operative seduced a contractor into giving her his computer password. His system was later found to have several foreign intelligence service viruses.

At least three times last year, contractors traveling in Canada were slipped Canadian coins that contained radio frequency transmitters, according to the report.

Overall, 971 suspicious contact reports were received from cleared defense contractors in 2005, a 43 percent increase over the previous year. A total of 342 cleared contractors, or 3 percent of the cleared industry, reported suspicious foreign contacts.

The cleared defense industry is a prime target because they produce advanced dual-use technologies, according to the report. “The U.S. defense industry is the most important player when it comes to safeguarding information critical to our national security,” it states.

Information systems technology was the favorite target, garnering 22 percent of theft attempts. Modeling and simulation technology has been increasingly targeted by foreign entities, according to the report. Some other highly sought-after technologies include lasers and optics, aeronautics, and sensors.


upcoming event

Green Computing Summit, Ronald Reagan Building, Washington, DC
December 2 - December 3, 2008

Trusted Internet Connection and the Comprehensive National Cyber Security Initiative, The Willard Intercontinental Hotel, Washington, DC
December 4, 2008


 

head
fcw
issue
First Name State
Last Name Zip
Title Email