Search FCW


Subscribe Now!
Table of Contents
Sprint
Business
BPM
CXOs
Columns
Columnists
Defense
E-Government
Elections 2008
Enterprise Architecture
Funding
Homeland Security
Health IT
IPv6
LOB
Management
Procurement
Privacy
Policy
Program Management
State and Local
Security
Technology
Telework
Training and Certification
Workforce

More Topics
resourcecenter
Home
Letters to the Editor
Current Issue/Download
Print/Online Archives
Editorial Calendar
researchstore
resourcecenter
Communications for Continuity Operations

Oracle Resource Center
NEW! Transforming Data Center
Managed Services
Service Oriented Architecture
Training & Simulation
Networking Communications
Security Directives and Compliance
Data Center Virtualization
Air Force ELSG Contract Guide

More >>



Latest News
ADVERTISEMENT





 

ITAA official criticizes SARA panel recommendations

By David Hubler
Published on December 5, 2006

Comment

Click here to comment on this article


Related story links

ITAA to Congress: Pass tax credit before adjourning

Grkavac: No need to turn back time

SARA panel looks at ethics


Newsletters

You might also be interested in these FCW newsletters:

Daily

To learn more, click here.


An official from the Information Technology Association of America said a federal panel’s forthcoming recommendations on purchasing commercial services could add time and expense to the government procurement process.

The Acquisition Advisory Panel has not yet released its recommendations, but ITAA and other industry groups are concerned about what they heard during the panel's deliberations. Lawmakers mandated the panel in the Service Acquisition Reform Act to look at ways to improve how government buys commercial services and solutions.

But the recommendations the panel considered "threaten to roll back a decade of procurement reforms that have considerably improved the federal government’s ability to serve its citizens,” Trey Hodgkins, ITAA’s director for defense and intelligence, told a gathering today hosted by the National Contract Management Association.

“If these recommendations were adopted, they would impose a procurement process that is less efficient, less effective and less fair for everyone involved – especially the taxpayers,” he said.

Hodgkins pointed to several of the panel’s recommendations that are of greatest concern to ITAA, including those that would:
• Permit additional protests on task and delivery orders, even after protests at the time of contract award had been concluded.
• Impose restrictive requirements for the use of time and material contracts, even when the government is unable to define requirements adequately or when time does not allow the use of other contract vehicles.
• Redefine commercial services in a way that would effectively exclude the latest cutting-edge commercial technologies from government acquisition.

ITAA and other associations formed a coalition to highlight their concerns about the panel. The other members of the coalition are the Aerospace Industries Association, the Contract Services Association, the Government Electronics and Information Technology Association, the National Defense Industrial Association and the Professional Services Council.


upcoming event

Green Computing Summit, Ronald Reagan Building, Washington, DC
December 2 - December 3, 2008

Trusted Internet Connection and the Comprehensive National Cyber Security Initiative, The Willard Intercontinental Hotel, Washington, DC
December 4, 2008


 

head
fcw
issue
First Name State
Last Name Zip
Title Email