Search FCW


Subscribe Now!
Table of Contents
Business
BPM
CXOs
Columns
Columnists
Defense
E-Government
Elections 2008
Enterprise Architecture
Funding
Homeland Security
Health IT
IPv6
LOB
Management
Procurement
Privacy
Policy
Program Management
State and Local
Security
Technology
Telework
Workforce

More Topics
resourcecenter
Home
Letters to the Editor
Current Issue/Download
Print/Online Archives
Editorial Calendar
researchstore
resourcecenter
Sprint Communications for Continuity Operations
Oracle Resource Center
GSA: Your Customer Service Agency
Government Leadership Survey
Green Solutions Guide
Report: Information Sharing
DISA IT Strategy & Vision
Emergency Preparedness Report
Report: Green Computing
PEO EIS Guidebook
Content Library

More >>



Latest News
ADVERTISEMENT





 

GSA's Doan, IG struggle over money

By Matthew Weigelt
Published on December 4, 2006

Comment

Click here to comment on this article


Related story links

Doan proposes shuffling GSA's central office, policy shop

Doan campaigns against SEWP

GSA to DOD IG: We're getting it right


Newsletters

You might also be interested in these FCW newsletters:

Daily

To learn more, click here.


Lurita Doan, administrator of the General Services Administration, fired back today at the GSA inspector general’s “old Washington two-step” regarding cuts to the office’s budget.

The Washington Post wrote Dec. 2 about Doan’s push to cut back Inspector General Brian Miller’s budget and decrease the number of audits, limiting his ability to do his job and intimidating his workforce.

Doan said she has asked all parts of GSA to trim spending as she tries to save money.

“Well, as you know, I’m new to this business and I’m not a Washington political insider, but I have learned to recognize the old Washington two-step that’s been around for a very long time,” Doan said in a speech at the Government Contract Management Conference, hosted by the National Contract Management Association.

The two-step comes whenever an agency has to cut its budget, Doan said. The agency attempts to put up its most important program as a sacrificial lamb. But, she added, there are always other options, and the IG has many options to cut back its budget.

Doan said Miller told her that his office could not cut spending or keep the spending increase below 30 percent. “I wish, I really wish I could have gotten an automatic 30 percent increase in my business’ budget every year. Don’t you?”

Doan said the IG asked GSA to comment on useful audits for the upcoming year. She gathered a task force of high-ranking GSA officials, including Deputy Administrator David Bibb and representatives from agency divisions, to evaluate potential audits.

She said the GSA task force offered its suggestions for useful audits. For example, they considered an audit of the Federal Acquisition Service impractical because, “we only stood it up last month,” she said. Doan and the task force suggested that the IG postpone the audit.

Robert Samuels, spokesman for the IG, said the recommendations suggest cuts to 50 percent of Miller’s audits. He said Miller considered that to be drastic.

Samuels added that the funding issue boils down to $5 million that GSA officials want, which the IG intends to use for fiscal 2007 preaward audits. The question is who will get the money, he said.

Doan said she has asked the agency to do more with less money, especially with the new FAS.

“From my experience, which I have gained over the last 96 hours or so, cutting wasteful spending — even of a very small amount — is not an easy task,” she said.


upcoming event

Enterprise Architecture 2008 - Washington, DC
September 9 - September 10, 2008

Occupational Health & Safety Executive Summit - Arlington, VA
October 6 - October 7, 2008


 

head
fcw
issue
First Name State
Last Name Zip
Title Email