Search FCW


Subscribe Now!
Table of Contents
Sprint
Business
BPM
CXOs
Columns
Columnists
Defense
E-Government
Elections 2008
Enterprise Architecture
Funding
Homeland Security
Health IT
IPv6
LOB
Management
Procurement
Privacy
Policy
Program Management
State and Local
Security
Technology
Telework
Training and Certification
Workforce

More Topics
resourcecenter
Home
Letters to the Editor
Current Issue/Download
Print/Online Archives
Editorial Calendar
researchstore
resourcecenter
Communications for Continuity Operations

Oracle Resource Center
NEW - Air Force ELSG Contract Guide
NEW - Security Management
NEW - DOD and Security Guide
Networx Contract Guide
SEWP IV Contract Guide
Priority Report: Virtualization
NEW - CHESS formerly ASCP
New - SATCOM II

More >>



Latest News
ADVERTISEMENT





 

Experts say border security technologies offer no panacea

By Wade-Hahn Chan
Published on September 14, 2006

Comment

Click here to comment on this article


Related story links

SBInet now a factor in immigration debate


Newsletters

You might also be interested in these FCW newsletters:

Daily

To learn more, click here.


The Homeland Security Department uses a variety of technologies, such as unattended ground sensors and cameras, to help secure U.S. borders. But those and other technologies offer no fail-safe border protection, according to the testimony of experts Sept. 13 before the House Science Committee. Jay Cohen, undersecretary for science and technology at DHS, said his division is exploring the use of technologies as part of the department’s Secure Border Initiative. "The goal is to provide agents and officers with total scene awareness capability that provides a geospatially referenced detection, classification and tracking capability along with collaboration and decision-making tools to improve efficiency,” he said. Cohen added that DHS is working with the Federal Aviation Administration to remove that agency’s limitations on the use of unmanned aerial vehicles for patrolling U.S. borders. Others testified about the limitations of various technologies in making the borders more secure. Gordon Tyler, head of the National Security Technology Department at Johns Hopkins University’s Applied Physics Laboratory, said 10,000 miles of land and coastal borders represents a vulnerability that is difficult to overcome with technology. Cameras and sensors, for example, “cannot differentiate between illegal alien activity and incidental activations caused by animals, seismic activities or weather,” Tyler said. Inconsistent and incomplete data entry compound those problems, he added. Peter Worch, an independent consultant to the Air Force Scientific Advisory board, said the best solution for those technical problems is to understand human behavior. “We need to know about [illegal immigrant] culture…we need to know about their terrain and their possible routes,” he said. “[This] tells us where to put the sensors and how to use them.”

upcoming event

Enterprise Architecture 2008 - Washington, DC
September 9 - September 10, 2008

Occupational Health & Safety Executive Summit - Arlington, VA
October 6 - October 7, 2008


 

head
fcw
issue
First Name State
Last Name Zip
Title Email