Search FCW


Subscribe Now!
Table of Contents
Sprint
Business
BPM
CXOs
Columns
Columnists
Defense
E-Government
Elections 2008
Enterprise Architecture
Funding
Homeland Security
Health IT
IPv6
LOB
Management
Procurement
Privacy
Policy
Program Management
State and Local
Security
Technology
Telework
Training and Certification
Workforce

More Topics
resourcecenter
Home
Letters to the Editor
Current Issue/Download
Print/Online Archives
Editorial Calendar
researchstore
resourcecenter
Communications for Continuity Operations

Oracle Resource Center
NEW! Transforming Data Center
Managed Services
Service Oriented Architecture
Training & Simulation
Networking Communications
Security Directives and Compliance
Data Center Virtualization
Air Force ELSG Contract Guide

More >>



Latest News
ADVERTISEMENT





 

GAO: DOD mismanaging contractors

By Josh Rogin
Published on September 8, 2006

Comment

Click here to comment on this article


Related story links

GAO: DOD modernization needs leadership

GAO: Attack warning systems over cost, behind schedule

GAO criticizes DOD classification program


Newsletters

You might also be interested in these FCW newsletters:

Daily

To learn more, click here.


The Defense Department is increasingly reliant on private contracting, but its overworked acquisitions staff is mismanaging contractors, resulting in lost time and money and shortchanging warfighters’ capabilities, according to the Government Accountability Office.

DOD obligations for contract goods and services totaled about $270 billion in fiscal 2005, an 88 percent increase over fiscal 2000. But only 41 percent of DOD contract obligations in fiscal 2005 were awarded using full and open competitions, GAO Comptroller General David Walker testified Sept. 7 before the House Appropriations Committee’s Defense Subcommittee.

“As overall obligations have increased so has [DOD’s] reliance on the private sector to provide services to fulfill DOD’s mission and support its operations,” he said.

DOD failed to properly oversee contracts by appointing performance monitors in more than a third of the cases studied, GAO found. Also, the department routinely paid award incentives without holding contractors accountable for meeting award goals. DOD paid about $8 billion in award fees regardless of contractor performance in the contracts GAO reviewed.

Furthermore, DOD’s acquisition community has skills gaps and serious succession-planning challenges, Walker said. The size of its acquisition workforce has remained constant despite the growing number and complexity of contracts. Downsizing in the 1990s exacerbated the problem, he added.

The delayed availability of critical technologies is partly responsible for cost overruns, Walker said. DOD looks to revolutionary solutions, which are often immature, resulting in less capability for warfighters, he said.

The department also allows new requirements to be added in the middle of an acquisition cycle, stretching the technologies and creating design challenges, Walker said.

“DOD is counting on these efforts to fundamentally transform military operations,” Walker testified, but transformational programs are the worst offenders. For example, cost estimates for the Future Combat Systems (FCS) program have risen from $82.6 billion to $127.2 billion, a 54 percent increase.

Only one of 51 critical technologies for FCS reached a high level of technical readiness before the program was advanced to the system design and development phase, said Rep. C.W. Bill Young (R-Fla.), the subcommittee’s chairman.

Congress is obliged to examine huge cost overruns, which increased by $45.7 billion between September and December 2005, Young said. Congressional “support is threatened if we cannot justify the large sums we are providing for contracts and procurements,” he added.

Kenneth Krieg, undersecretary of Defense for acquisition, technology and logistics, said creating a 21st-century acquisitions workforce was his No. 1 goal. The department will also speed technology development by linking it with other DOD processes, Krieg testified.

Among those efforts, the department is experimenting with capability portfolios in the areas of joint command and control, network-centric operations, battlespace awareness, and joint logistics. Those initiatives will allow greater coordination in developing technologies and greater awareness for decision-making, Krieg said.



upcoming event

Program Management Summit 2008, Ronald Reagan Building, Washington, DC
November 18 - November 19, 2008

Defense and Intelligence Solutions for Business Transformation-DC, Grand Hyatt, Washington, D.C.
November 18, 2008

Building Sustainable Business Models in a Green World, The Willard Hotel 1401 PA Ave., NW Washington, DC
November 19, 2008, 8:00 AM - 10:00 AM

Security 2008, Ronald Reagan Building, Washington, DC
November 20 - November 21, 2008


 

head
fcw
issue
First Name State
Last Name Zip
Title Email