Search FCW


Subscribe Now!
Table of Contents
Business
BPM
CXOs
Columns
Columnists
Defense
E-Government
Elections 2008
Enterprise Architecture
Funding
Homeland Security
Health IT
IPv6
LOB
Management
Procurement
Privacy
Policy
Program Management
State and Local
Security
Technology
Telework
Workforce

More Topics
resourcecenter
Home
Letters to the Editor
Current Issue/Download
Print/Online Archives
Editorial Calendar
researchstore
resourcecenter
Sprint Communications for Continuity Operations
Oracle Resource Center
GSA: Your Customer Service Agency
Government Leadership Survey
Green Solutions Guide
Report: Information Sharing
DISA IT Strategy & Vision
Emergency Preparedness Report
Report: Green Computing
PEO EIS Guidebook
Content Library

More >>



Latest News
ADVERTISEMENT





 

DOD IG audit finds fault; GSA defends improvements

By Matthew Weigelt
Published on August 24, 2006

Comment

Click here to comment on this article


Related story links

GSA to DOD IG: We're getting it right

Doan: Restoring customer confidence is job one

GSA regions struggle to generate revenues


Newsletters

You might also be interested in these FCW newsletters:

Daily

To learn more, click here.


The Defense Department inspector general found that the General Services Administration and DOD made numerous procurement errors by not fully abiding by appropriations law and procurement regulations, according to a yet-to-be-released draft IG audit report.

On Aug. 23, GSA officials defended their improvements to the agency’s procurement processes.

In the July 21 audit, the IG found 55 of the 56 purchases audited were either hastily planned or improperly executed or funded, according to the report. The audit also found:

  • GSA and DOD violated the Anti-Deficiency Act by improperly using appropriations on 12 of 54 reviewed purchases.
  • GSA’s Client Support Centers (CSCs) did not give enough justification for sole-source procurements on six of 14 purchases.
  • DOD organizations’ interagency agreements with GSA were inadequate on 54 of the 56 purchases.
GSA Administrator Lurita Doan and Federal Acquisition Service Commissioner Jim Williams said they are frustrated by the errors in the audit report and each sent letters to the IG.

Williams, responding to the draft report Aug. 17, recommended that the IG completely delete the comments about the six sole-source procurements and the four CSCs from the report. He wrote that the IG failed to include evidence for focusing on the centers.

He suggested that the report state that the IG “found significant improvements by both GSA and DOD contracting and program management officials in the use of GSA’s assisted acquisition process,” according to Williams’ letter.

A DOD IG spokesman said the IG stands by the audit. “To date, nothing has been provided to us to change our position,” he said.

DOD and GSA are meeting to resolve problems. Meanwhile, DOD will continue to do business with all CSCs, the report states.

GSA has worked hard to correct any problems and ensure that the agency meets contracting rules and regulations, said David Bibb, GSA deputy administrator.

GSA is mostly concerned about the agency’s credibility with customers, which it has been trying to rebuild, Bibb said. The report leaves an incorrect impression about how GSA handles procurements, he said.



upcoming event

Enterprise Architecture 2008 - Washington, DC
September 9 - September 10, 2008

Occupational Health & Safety Executive Summit - Arlington, VA
October 6 - October 7, 2008


 

head
fcw
issue
First Name State
Last Name Zip
Title Email