The House Veterans Affairs Committee told current and past information technology officials from the Department of Veterans Affairs today that the VAs be patient attitude toward its long-planned IT reorganization was no longer acceptable. In addition, the committees chairman proposed that the VA elevate the chief information officers status.
Committee Chairman Rep. Steve Buyer (R-Ind.) expressed dismay over the VAs refusal to get control of IT, calling the departments leaders centurions of the status quo.
He said he was deeply concerned about the potential for further security breaches after a laptop computer and mobile device containing personal information including Social Security numbers on more than 26 million veterans was stolen from a VA employees home earlier this month.
Buyer proposed elevating the VAs CIO to the undersecretary level and the deputy CIO to assistant secretary.
Robert McFarland and John Gauss, both former assistant secretaries for information and technology at the VA, and Robert Howard, the departments acting assistant secretary for information and technology, concurred with the proposal.
The VA needs very clear directives with [top-level] signatures on them to move the IT reorganization forward, Howard said. He was also critical of the lack of deadlines for officials to approve directives and other implementation plans.
The new VA IT management system will strengthen the protection of all sensitive information, he said.
We can fix it and were heading in the right direction, Howard added.
Rep. Michael Bilirakis (R-Fla.) was dubious. Promises made to Congress have not been kept, he said. Were having to micromanage VA, and we shouldnt be.
The committee is considering a package of new legislation for the VA that would tighten security and give the CIO greater authority, Buyer said. In that regard, he suggested that the VA and the Defense Department adopt an ID system for service personnel and veterans that does not use Social Security numbers.
In addition to elevating the CIO and deputy CIO, Buyer proposed rewriting performance evaluations to link senior executives performance bonuses to IT compliance.
He is also considering barring IT contractors from hiring offshore subcontractors to prevent the loss of confidential or personal data abroad, he said.
But McFarland cautioned that such a step could harm relations with contractors and U.S. allies. You need to know who your contractors are, McFarland said, adding that a more prudent step would be to encourage contractors to advise the agency when they think about hiring offshore subcontractors.
The committee will hear from several more witnesses June 29.