Search FCW


Subscribe Now!
Table of Contents
Sprint
Business
BPM
CXOs
Columns
Columnists
Defense
E-Government
Elections 2008
Enterprise Architecture
Funding
Homeland Security
Health IT
IPv6
LOB
Management
Procurement
Privacy
Policy
Program Management
State and Local
Security
Technology
Telework
Training and Certification
Workforce

More Topics
resourcecenter
Home
Letters to the Editor
Current Issue/Download
Print/Online Archives
Editorial Calendar
researchstore
resourcecenter
Communications for Continuity Operations

Oracle Resource Center
NEW! Transforming Data Center
Managed Services
Service Oriented Architecture
Training & Simulation
Networking Communications
Security Directives and Compliance
Data Center Virtualization
Air Force ELSG Contract Guide

More >>



Latest News
ADVERTISEMENT





 

Input critiques financial management line of business

By Michael Hardy
Published on June 6, 2006

Comment

Click here to comment on this article


Related story links

GSA seeks comments on financial guidance


Newsletters

You might also be interested in these FCW newsletters:

Daily

To learn more, click here.


Vendors are likely to be crippled in their ability to compete for work under the Financial Management Line of Business until the Office of Management and Budget clarifies rules for Circular A-76 competitions, according to a June 7 report from Input. Guidance that OMB issued in late May includes a competitive framework marked by standard A-76 contracting rules, which govern the process of opening agency jobs to private-sector competition. According to Input, vendors expected the guidance to offer more formal direction and procedural explanation than it does. The heart of the issue is that under OMB policy, agencies that need to upgrade a core financial management system must either migrate to a shared service provider (SSP), become an SSP or contract with a vendor. However, according to Input, many agencies that would be competing to become SSPs face restraints from budget regulations that leave them unable to develop effective long-term proposals that cross budget cycles. Agencies are also able to plan their migration to new systems during a 10-year period, limiting the number of customers that an SSP may expect to gain at any given time, according to the report. The conflicting instruction brings effective competition to a standstill and calls for more clarity, according to the firm. James Krouse, acting director for public-sector market analysis at Input, said in a written statement that the line-of-business market is not emerging as it had once seemed it might. “When originally announced in 2004, the [line-of-business] market seemed as though it might emerge as a niche market for vendors at a time when the overall federal [information technology] market is beginning to slow,” Krouse said. “Now that idea appears less certain as vendors not only have to struggle with unclear agency timelines but with an A-76 competitive process that may prove to be favorable to government agency competitive participants going forward.”

upcoming event

Program Management Summit 2008, Ronald Reagan Building, Washington, DC
November 18 - November 19, 2008

Defense and Intelligence Solutions for Business Transformation-DC, Grand Hyatt, Washington, D.C.
November 18, 2008

Building Sustainable Business Models in a Green World, The Willard Hotel 1401 PA Ave., NW Washington, DC
November 19, 2008, 8:00 AM - 10:00 AM

Security 2008, Ronald Reagan Building, Washington, DC
November 20 - November 21, 2008


 

head
fcw
issue
First Name State
Last Name Zip
Title Email