Search FCW


Subscribe Now!
Table of Contents
Sprint
Business
BPM
CXOs
Columns
Columnists
Defense
E-Government
Elections 2008
Enterprise Architecture
Funding
Homeland Security
Health IT
IPv6
LOB
Management
Procurement
Privacy
Policy
Program Management
State and Local
Security
Technology
Telework
Training and Certification
Workforce

More Topics
resourcecenter
Home
Letters to the Editor
Current Issue/Download
Print/Online Archives
Editorial Calendar
researchstore
resourcecenter
Communications for Continuity Operations

Oracle Resource Center
NEW! Transforming Data Center
Managed Services
Service Oriented Architecture
Training & Simulation
Networking Communications
Security Directives and Compliance
Data Center Virtualization
Air Force ELSG Contract Guide

More >>



Latest News
ADVERTISEMENT





 

Security, funding concerns slow IPv6 transition

By Matthew Weigelt
Published on December 8, 2005

Comment

Click here to comment on this article


Related story links

New IP a go, but no new money

OMB: No new money for IPv6

Agencies must prepare for IPv6


Newsletters

You might also be interested in these FCW newsletters:

Daily

To learn more, click here.


Countries worldwide are implementing IPv6, yet security and funding concerns have slowed the transition’s pace in the U.S. government. Many information technology community leaders are concerned about the transition to IPv6 from IPv4, which has been the standard to date. Although IPv6 offers many new opportunities, Cyber Security Industry Alliance executive director Paul Kurtz said this is the first time such a major IP transition has been implemented. “There are no lessons learned from the last transition,” he said at the IPv6 Summit in Reston, Va., Dec. 8. Agencies are also concerned about the prospect of securing co-existing IPv4 and IPv6 networks during the transitional period, he added. At the forum, Juniper Networks released a draft of its white paper, "The IPv6 Best Practices World Report Series," which is designed to be a guide for agencies in the early stages of the transition. The document is the first in a series regarding best practices in the transition. It advises agencies to plan early and buy IPv6-capable equipment before the transition is complete. Because the Office of Management and Budget and the Defense Department are mandating that agencies migrate to IPv6 by June 2008, the Juniper report urges a centralized approach to avoid interoperability issues that might arise with a more fragmented effort. Mark Evans, an IPv6 transition leader at the Navy's Space and Naval Warfare Systems Command, said some are cautious about the transition because of concerns about the stability of IPv6 technologies. Some agencies are simply waiting until the technology becomes more mature, Evans said. Time is running out for them to meet the 2008 deadline, however, and Congress has not appropriated funding for the change. IPv6 advocates should catch the attention of lawmakers, most of whom are not IT-savvy, by couching the issue in the context of security concerns and leadership in technology, said Chas Phillips, policy counsel for the House Government Reform Committee. IPv6 will expand the universe of IP addresses by a number so big it seems almost infinite. Under IPv4, networked devices are limited to 4.3 billion possible addresses. IPv6, however, provides 340 trillion, trillion, trillion addresses.

upcoming event

Program Management Summit 2008, Ronald Reagan Building, Washington, DC
November 18 - November 19, 2008

Defense and Intelligence Solutions for Business Transformation-DC, Grand Hyatt, Washington, D.C.
November 18, 2008

Building Sustainable Business Models in a Green World, The Willard Hotel 1401 PA Ave., NW Washington, DC
November 19, 2008, 8:00 AM - 10:00 AM

Security 2008, Ronald Reagan Building, Washington, DC
November 20 - November 21, 2008


 

head
fcw
issue
First Name State
Last Name Zip
Title Email