Search FCW


Subscribe Now!
Table of Contents
Business
BPM
CXOs
Columns
Columnists
Defense
E-Government
Elections 2008
Enterprise Architecture
Funding
Homeland Security
Health IT
IPv6
LOB
Management
Procurement
Privacy
Policy
Program Management
State and Local
Security
Technology
Telework
Workforce

More Topics
resourcecenter
Home
Letters to the Editor
Current Issue/Download
Print/Online Archives
Editorial Calendar
resourcecenter
Oracle Microsite
DISA Guidebook
GI: Network Mgmt
Green Computing
Tech Watch: COOP
PR: IT Security
Alliant Contract Guide
Tech Watch: Mobile IT
Content Library

More >>



Latest News
ADVERTISEMENT





 

Committee approves bill on contractor fraud

By Matthew Weigelt
Published on April 16, 2008

Comment

Click here to comment on this article


Related story links

Details of H.R. 5712

Controversial proposed acquisition rule

House members seek information on proposed regulations

Councils propose ethics rule for contractors


Newsletters

You might also be interested in these FCW newsletters:

Daily
Policy and Procurement

To learn more, click here.


The House Oversight and Government Reform Committee approved a bill April 16 that would close a loophole in dealing with contractors in acquisition regulations. However, the panel amended the bill slightly to give regulators six months after the measure became law to close the loophole through the regulatory process.

The Close the Contractor Fraud Loophole Act , introduced April 3 by Rep. Peter Welch (D-Vt.), would require federal contractors to notify the contracting agency’s inspector general in writing if the company thinks it may have violated federal criminal law or was overpaid erroneously. Under the bill, agencies could consider suspending or debarring a contractor who knowingly fails to notify officials of a violation. The bill would apply to contracts performed in the United States or overseas. The measure now goes to the full House.

Welch’s bill originates from a change to the Federal Acquisition Regulation in November that required contractors to voluntarily report fraud and abuses, post inspector generals’ fraud hot line posters, and have a business code of ethics. However, the rule exempted contracts for commercial items and, in particular, contracts performed overseas, a provision officials based on a 20-year-old Defense Department rule.

That tells contractors, “if you’re going to commit fraud, go overseas and do it,” Welch said at an April 15 hearing of the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee’s Government Management, Organization and Procurement Subcommittee.

Rep. Tom Davis (R-Va.), ranking member of the committee, said Welch’s bill “is designed to close more political holes than loopholes.”

Regulators have opened a new FAR case to eliminate the exemptions after realizing the exemptions’ effect.

Welch noted that none of the top administration and agency acquisition officials committed to a timeline of when the regulation would be effective. “It raises significant questions, certainly on my part,” he said.

Paul Denett, administrator of the Office of Federal Procurement Policy, said he would speed the proposed rule through the regulatory process.

“Give us a turn at bat, you’ll be pleased by the outcome,” Denett said.

Procurement officials told lawmakers the regulatory process would close the loophole as legislators want, rendering Welch’s bill unnecessary.

“I can’t quite accept that,” said Rep. Edolphus Towns (D-N.Y.), the subcommittee's chairman.

Some lawmakers said they don’t trust the administration to finish the job, and that  requires them to step in.

“We need to do something,” Towns said.



upcoming event

Solution Seminar: Realizing the Benefits of Unified Physical and Logical Security Systems
May 6, 2008

Green Computing Summit 2008
May 20, 2008


 

head
fcw
issue
First Name State
Last Name Zip
Title Email