Search FCW


Subscribe Now!
Table of Contents
Sprint
Business
BPM
CXOs
Columns
Columnists
Defense
E-Government
Elections 2008
Enterprise Architecture
Funding
Homeland Security
Health IT
IPv6
LOB
Management
Procurement
Privacy
Policy
Program Management
State and Local
Security
Technology
Telework
Training and Certification
Workforce

More Topics
resourcecenter
Home
Letters to the Editor
Current Issue/Download
Print/Online Archives
Editorial Calendar
researchstore
resourcecenter
Communications for Continuity Operations

Oracle Resource Center
NEW! Transforming Data Center
Managed Services
Service Oriented Architecture
Training & Simulation
Networking Communications
Security Directives and Compliance
Data Center Virtualization
Air Force ELSG Contract Guide

More >>



Latest News
ADVERTISEMENT





 

IG: DOD fails to keep contractor performance records

By Jason Miller
Published on February 29, 2008

Comment

Click here to comment on this article


Related story links

IG audit (.pdf)

Make good data great


Newsletters

You might also be interested in these FCW newsletters:

Daily
Defense
Management
Policy and Procurement

To learn more, click here.


The Defense Department has paid little attention to keeping past-performance records on contractors, according to a new DOD inspector general report.

DOD’s Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System doesn’t include ratings on all active system contracts worth more than $5 million, according to the report released today. These system contracts include products that require a significant amount of new engineering work and major changes to existing systems, and contractors’ performance on these contracts is a major factor in their chances of getting future contracts from DOD or other departments.

The IG found more problems with performance assessments. When officials entered assessments, 39 percent of 2,499 contracts were registered more than a year late.

Timeliness is important so acquisition officials have good information to make buying decisions, the IG wrote. “As more time passes…the past-performance information becomes less valuable.”

Although timeliness increases the value of the information, officials didn’t write detailed or sufficient narratives. They didn’t convey their reasoning. The assessments had vague language, few facts and unjustified ratings, the report states. The IG found that officials failed to establish credible and justifiable ratings on 82 percent of the 66 reports reviewed.

Officials need to submit a narrative that thoroughly describes the circumstances for a rating, the IG wrote, and added, “It is of the utmost importance."  

The IG recommended issuing a policy that requires acquisition officials to register the information in the database. Just handing out guidance documents doesn’t do enough. “We believe a policy guide is no more than a practical reference tool with suggested requirements,” the IG wrote.

Responding Jan. 17 to a draft of the report, Shay Assad, DOD’s director of defense procurement and acquisition policy, agreed with the recommendations and wrote that by March 31 he would issue  a policy requiring acquisition officials to enter timely assessments into the database. Similarly, Charlie Williams, the Air Force’s deputy assistant secretary for contracting and assistant secretary for acquisition, agreed with the IG’s recommendations.


upcoming event

Green Computing Summit, Ronald Reagan Building, Washington, DC
December 2 - December 3, 2008

Trusted Internet Connection and the Comprehensive National Cyber Security Initiative, The Willard Intercontinental Hotel, Washington, DC
December 4, 2008


 

head
fcw
issue
First Name State
Last Name Zip
Title Email