Search FCW


Subscribe Now!
Table of Contents
Sprint
Business
BPM
CXOs
Columns
Columnists
Defense
E-Government
Elections 2008
Enterprise Architecture
Funding
Homeland Security
Health IT
IPv6
LOB
Management
Procurement
Privacy
Policy
Program Management
State and Local
Security
Technology
Telework
Training and Certification
Workforce

More Topics
resourcecenter
Home
Letters to the Editor
Current Issue/Download
Print/Online Archives
Editorial Calendar
researchstore
resourcecenter
Communications for Continuity Operations

Oracle Resource Center
NEW! Transforming Data Center
Managed Services
Service Oriented Architecture
Training & Simulation
Networking Communications
Security Directives and Compliance
Data Center Virtualization
Air Force ELSG Contract Guide

More >>



Latest News
ADVERTISEMENT





 

Lawmakers want quality, not quantity, in security clearances

By Wade-Hahn Chan
Published on February 28, 2008

Comment

Click here to comment on this article


Related story links

OMB: Security clearance backlog will be under control this year

DOD, OPM said ready for security clearance reform


Newsletters

You might also be interested in these FCW newsletters:

Daily
Management
Security

To learn more, click here.


Although officials at the Office of Management and Budget and the Office of Personnel Management are completing security clearance applications faster, lawmakers criticized the efficiency of the screening process.

At a hearing of the House Intelligence Committee Feb. 27, lawmakers said many potentially good candidates may have their clearance applications rejected because of outdated policies.

“I know constituents, others who have been rejected — I’m pretty convinced — unfairly,” said Rep. Rush Holt (D-N.J.).

OMB Deputy Director for Management Clay Johnson responded by saying that the more important issue is that the clearance process has resulted in no security breaches. “The primary issue is not that we are giving clearances to people who shouldn’t have them,” he said. “What we have here is a timeliness issue.”

OPM, OMB and other agencies involved in the security clearance process have gained ground on the efficiency of security clearances. On Feb. 15, Johnson said in a phone interview that most agencies will be able to tackle their older backlogs by the next milestone date, December 2009.

But Rep. Darrell Issa (R-Calif.) expressed concerns about the application process. He cited a 2005 case in which an applicant was rejected on the basis of having contact with foreign government officials.

Issa also said agencies didn’t share the results of background checks, saying that some agencies redid polygraph tests. “We still repolygraph people when they move [to other agencies] looking at the same data.”

Agencies need a standardized clearance review process, Issa said. “Congress has been clear in terms of oneness of standards, oneness of process [and] the quality and acceptance of each other’s clearances,” he said. “We want someone who has a need to know something, to have been cleared to get it.”

Johnson defended his efforts, saying that the reform of the security clearance process — which includes moving to a paperless system — is coming. “There’s a transformation effort under way by the [Office of the Director of National Intelligence] and OPM [that are] looking at all the things we can do to transform the system,” he said.


upcoming event

Green Computing Summit, Ronald Reagan Building, Washington, DC
December 2 - December 3, 2008

Trusted Internet Connection and the Comprehensive National Cyber Security Initiative, The Willard Intercontinental Hotel, Washington, DC
December 4, 2008


 

head
fcw
issue
First Name State
Last Name Zip
Title Email