Search FCW


Subscribe Now!
Table of Contents
Business
BPM
CXOs
Columns
Columnists
Defense
E-Government
Elections 2008
Enterprise Architecture
Funding
Homeland Security
Health IT
IPv6
LOB
Management
Procurement
Privacy
Policy
Program Management
State and Local
Security
Technology
Telework
Workforce

More Topics
resourcecenter
Home
Letters to the Editor
Current Issue/Download
Print/Online Archives
Editorial Calendar
resourcecenter
Oracle Microsite
DISA Guidebook
GI: Network Mgmt
Green Computing
Tech Watch: COOP
PR: IT Security
Alliant Contract Guide
Tech Watch: Mobile IT
Content Library

More >>



Latest News
ADVERTISEMENT





 

Use of brand names in solicitations still a problem

By Jason Miller
Published on December 26, 2007

Comment

Click here to comment on this article


Related story links

OMB memo on brand names for secure desktop purchases (.pdf)

OMB memo on use of brand names in solicitations (.pdf)

OFPP: Watch use of brand names in proposals

DHS extends OneNet bids for third time


Newsletters

You might also be interested in these FCW newsletters:

Daily
Policy and Procurement

To learn more, click here.


For the second time in a month, the Office of Management and Budget is reminding agencies not to specify brand names in procurements.

The latest memo from Karen Evans, OMB’s administrator for e-government and information technology, and Paul Denett, the administrator of the Office of Federal Procurement Policy, on Dec. 19 also addresses confusion about the Federal Desktop Core Configuration (FDCC) initiative.

Evans and Denett remind agencies that the requirement to implement the FDCC when using Microsoft Windows XP and Vista does not “limit selection and acquisition to only information technology with established security configurations (e.g. the FDCC).”

Operating-systems vendors other than Microsoft expressed concern that some agencies believed they could only buy Windows-based systems under the FDCC mandate.

“Many vendors, including Red Hat, are having discussions with OMB about this misperception of the FDCC,” said Paul Smith, Red Hat’s vice president of government sales operations. It “is absolutely not a mandate, but a suggested image for those deploying Windows on the desktop. In fact, there could and should be an FDCC for other environments that can be deployed on the desktop. This is a huge issue and a huge misperception.”

This memo follows one from OMB on Nov. 28 reminding agencies that using specific brand names or the phrase “brand name or equal” should only be done when agencies consider it advantageous or necessary to meet their goals.

In the November memo, agencies were asked to develop internal controls to monitor the use of brand names in procurements.

In the most recent guidance, OMB wants agencies to be sure they “make use of adequate competition and maintain vendor neutral capital planning and control procedures.”

OMB also said the Federal Acquisition Regulations Council will revise the part of the Federal Acquisition Regulations that deals with IT acquisition. The revision will focus on including appropriate IT security policies and requirements when acquiring technology products and services, including the FDCC.

This is OMB's fourth memo since 2005 repeating the prohibition on brand names in solicitations.


upcoming event

Solution Seminar: Realizing the Benefits of Unified Physical and Logical Security Systems
May 6, 2008

Green Computing Summit 2008
May 20, 2008


 

head
fcw
issue
First Name State
Last Name Zip
Title Email