Search FCW


Subscribe Now!
Table of Contents
Sprint
Business
BPM
CXOs
Columns
Columnists
Defense
E-Government
Elections 2008
Enterprise Architecture
Funding
Homeland Security
Health IT
IPv6
LOB
Management
Procurement
Privacy
Policy
Program Management
State and Local
Security
Technology
Telework
Workforce

More Topics
resourcecenter
Home
Letters to the Editor
Current Issue/Download
Print/Online Archives
Editorial Calendar
researchstore
resourcecenter
Sprint Communications for Continuity of Operations
Oracle Resource Center
NEW! SEWP IV Contract Guide
NEW! Priority Report: Virtualization
GSA: Your Customer Service Agency
Government Leadership Survey
Green Solutions Guide
Report: Information Sharing
DISA IT Strategy & Vision
Emergency Preparedness Report
Report: Green Computing
PEO EIS Guidebook
Content Library

More >>



Latest News
ADVERTISEMENT





 

IG: DOD fails on competition

By Matthew Weigelt
Published on November 27, 2007

Comment

Click here to comment on this article


Related story links

DOD IG report (.pdf)

IG: DOD wasted money by placing orders with GSA

DOD program manager: Know Army needs before bidding


Newsletters

You might also be interested in these FCW newsletters:

Daily
Defense
Policy and Procurement

To learn more, click here.


The Defense Department awarded numerous task orders without competition, and it failed to justify why officials went outside of the department for acquisition services, a new report found.

The DOD inspector general audited 98 task orders worth $33.2 million in commercial supplies purchased through the National Institutes of Health’s Electronic Commodities Store III governmentwide acquisition contract. Of those orders, 95 failed to afford all contractors a chance to bid. And on 31 of the orders, contracting officers did not document their reasons for the award, the report states.

“Competition was limited, and DOD did not have assurance it received the best value when procuring goods,” the IG concludes.

The IG also reviewed 28 other task orders for $697.6 million in services on NIH’s  Chief Information Officer-Solutions and Partners 2 Innovations GWAC. The IG found that DOD program officials limited the amount of time contractors could bid on 24 of the orders.

What's more, officials allowed a contractor to perform an inherently governmental function for one task order.

“Skill and good judgment are required to effectively protect the public interest,” the IG wrote.

The IG also wrote that DOD officials did not justify why it went outside DOD to make the purchases. The audit found that 48 contract actions had no justifications for going to NIH, and 62 actions had inadequate reasons for the decision.

The IG has been critical of going outside DOD for supplies. The IG said in October that the Air Force wasted $607,000 in fees by using the General Services Administration’s services.


upcoming event

Enterprise Architecture 2008 - Washington, DC
September 9 - September 10, 2008

Occupational Health & Safety Executive Summit - Arlington, VA
October 6 - October 7, 2008


 

head
fcw
issue
First Name State
Last Name Zip
Title Email