Search FCW


Subscribe Now!
Table of Contents
Business
BPM
CXOs
Columns
Columnists
Defense
E-Government
Elections 2008
Enterprise Architecture
Funding
Homeland Security
Health IT
IPv6
LOB
Management
Procurement
Privacy
Policy
Program Management
State and Local
Security
Technology
Telework
Workforce

More Topics
resourcecenter
Home
Letters to the Editor
Current Issue/Download
Print/Online Archives
Editorial Calendar
researchstore
resourcecenter
Sprint Communications for Continuity Operations
Oracle Resource Center
GSA: Your Customer Service Agency
Government Leadership Survey
Green Solutions Guide
Report: Information Sharing
DISA IT Strategy & Vision
Emergency Preparedness Report
Report: Green Computing
PEO EIS Guidebook
Content Library

More >>



Latest News
ADVERTISEMENT





 

Clinton: Alaska Native firm may have gotten unfair bonus

By Alice Lipowicz
Published on November 27, 2007

Comment

Click here to comment on this article


Related story links

IG: DHS wrongly awarded contract to Alaska Native firm


Newsletters

You might also be interested in these FCW newsletters:

Daily
Homeland Security
Policy and Procurement
State and Local

To learn more, click here.


The company that received an improper $475 million contract from the Homeland Security Department may also have received an inappropriate financial bonus as part of the deal, Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton (D-N.Y.), said today.

Alaska Native firm Chenega Technology Services was improperly awarded the sole-source screening-equipment maintenance contract by the Customs and Border Protection Agency in 2003, according to a Nov. 20 report from DHS Inspector General Richard Skinner.

The agency used an incorrect industry code that allowed for exemptions from various restrictions on the contract, Skinner’s report states. DHS did not comply with federal contracting regulations, and, as a result, the government did not receive the best value for the contract, he said.

Clinton called on Skinner to expand the investigation to determine whether Chenega also received questionable award fees as part of the contract and evaluate whether DHS is paying other inappropriate award fees.

Under the Federal Acquisition Regulation, award fees may be made to reward excellent contractor performance. But Clinton said she is responding to several reports of such fees being paid without regard to performance.

Clinton, in a letter to Skinner, said the IG’s staff informed her that award fees were paid to Chenega as part of its contract with the agency. Because those fees were not specifically reviewed in Skinner’s report, Clinton requested details of the fees and further investigation.

Furthermore, Clinton noted a “troubling pattern” of reports of award fees at DHS and asked Skinner to investigate.

“In too many cases, DHS appears to be awarding bonuses despite poor performance, or worse, without even evaluating work,” Clinton wrote. “Failing contractors should be rooted out, not rewarded. Given your report of what appears to be noncompliant federal contracting practices on the part of the DHS and a pattern of providing award fees to contractors without justification, I request that you expand your investigation into the practice of award fees by the department, especially when it comes to no-bid contacts.”

Clinton specifically asked Skinner to investigate and review the following:
  • The Transportation Security Administration’s alleged payment of award fees to Boeing in connection with a contract for the installation and maintenance of explosive-detection equipment at U.S. airports.
  • TSA Passenger and Baggage Screening Pilot Program award fees paid without proper performance determinations, according to a previous IG report.
  • Government Accountability Office findings of award fees paid for the Coast Guard’s Deepwater contract despite documented problems in schedule, performance, cost control and contract administration.
Clinton also asked for information on the total amounts of award fees paid by DHS, how the award fees were linked to successful acquisition outcomes and what mechanisms are in place to ensure appropriate justifications for award fees.

Alice Lipowicz writes for Washington Technology, an 1105 Government Information Group publication.


upcoming event

Enterprise Architecture 2008 - Washington, DC
September 9 - September 10, 2008

Occupational Health & Safety Executive Summit - Arlington, VA
October 6 - October 7, 2008


 

head
fcw
issue
First Name State
Last Name Zip
Title Email