Search FCW


Subscribe Now!
Table of Contents
Sprint
Business
BPM
CXOs
Columns
Columnists
Defense
E-Government
Elections 2008
Enterprise Architecture
Funding
Homeland Security
Health IT
IPv6
LOB
Management
Procurement
Privacy
Policy
Program Management
State and Local
Security
Technology
Telework
Training and Certification
Workforce

More Topics
resourcecenter
Home
Letters to the Editor
Current Issue/Download
Print/Online Archives
Editorial Calendar
researchstore
resourcecenter
Communications for Continuity Operations

Oracle Resource Center
NEW! Transforming Data Center
Managed Services
Service Oriented Architecture
Training & Simulation
Networking Communications
Security Directives and Compliance
Data Center Virtualization
Air Force ELSG Contract Guide

More >>



Latest News
ADVERTISEMENT





 

Budget holdups could keep air travelers playing name game

By Ben Bain
Published on November 8, 2007

Comment

Click here to comment on this article


Related story links

Nov. 8 Terrorist Watch List Hearing

Agencies standardize ways to deal with terrorist watch list concerns


Newsletters

You might also be interested in these FCW newsletters:

Daily
Homeland Security

To learn more, click here.


What’s in a name? For some travelers flying to, from and around the United States since the 2001 terrorist attacks, it’s everything.

And fliers whose names resemble or match those on the government’s no-fly list, which officials use to ground air passengers, won’t catch a break at the check-in counter as long as the Bush administration’s Secure Flight initiative goes unfunded, the Homeland Security Department’s screening chief said today. The administration has requested $74 million for the program for fiscal year 2008.

The Transportation Security Administration’s no-fly list, which lists only people suspected of being a threat to commercial aviation, is a smaller version of the Terrorist Screening Center’s (TSC) national watch list, a database of more than 800,000 records on 300,000 people, including their names and aliases.

A major problem with the current system is airline rather than government employees are responsible for initially screening travelers at check-in, said Kathleen Kraninger, DHS’ director of screening coordination, at a hearing of the House Homeland Security Committee. Under Secure Flight, TSA would take over the entire airport screening process.

Furthermore, although TSA issues the no-fly list to all airlines, differences in their technologies and systems mean that even if a passenger is cleared by one airline, he or she could be flagged by another, Kraninger testified.

She added that she is confident Secure Flight addresses the privacy concerns that grounded the agency’s previous edition in February 2006 after the Government Accountability Office and privacy groups criticized the program for violating privacy laws.

DHS components and other federal agencies receive different watch lists from TSC depending on their screening needs. If a traveler’s name is believed to match a name on the Terrorist Watch List, the traveler is further screened.

The watch lists are used to check for name matches to the records on the Terrorist Watch List and if an agency suspects that there is a match the Terrorist Screening Center is contacted.


upcoming event

Green Computing Summit, Ronald Reagan Building, Washington, DC
December 2 - December 3, 2008

Trusted Internet Connection and the Comprehensive National Cyber Security Initiative, The Willard Intercontinental Hotel, Washington, DC
December 4, 2008


 

head
fcw
issue
First Name State
Last Name Zip
Title Email