Search FCW


Subscribe Now!
Table of Contents
Sprint
Business
BPM
CXOs
Columns
Columnists
Defense
E-Government
Elections 2008
Enterprise Architecture
Funding
Homeland Security
Health IT
IPv6
LOB
Management
Procurement
Privacy
Policy
Program Management
State and Local
Security
Technology
Telework
Training and Certification
Workforce

More Topics
resourcecenter
Home
Letters to the Editor
Current Issue/Download
Print/Online Archives
Editorial Calendar
researchstore
resourcecenter
Communications for Continuity Operations

Oracle Resource Center
NEW - Data Center Virtualization
NEW - Air Force ELSG Contract Guide
NEW - Security Management
NEW - DOD and Security Guide
Networx Contract Guide
SEWP IV Contract Guide
Priority Report: Virtualization
NEW - CHESS formerly ASCP
New - SATCOM II

More >>



Latest News
ADVERTISEMENT





 

White House order puts HHS in charge of biosurveillance efforts

By Nancy Ferris
Published on October 22, 2007

Comment

Click here to comment on this article


Related story links

Homeland Security Presidential Directive 21

IG to DHS: Better manage bioterrorism program

CDC creates biosurveillance centers of excellence

The biosurveillance money pit


Newsletters

You might also be interested in these FCW newsletters:

Daily
Government Health IT
Homeland Security

To learn more, click here.


A new White House directive orders the Department of Health and Human Services to establish a national biosurveillance system to detect threats to human health and says the system should rely, where possible, on e-health records.

The directive, Homeland Security Presidential Directive 21, covers many aspects of public health and medical preparedness for a naturally occurring or deliberately induced health emergency on a large scale. The directive states that it “will transform our national approach to protecting the health of the American people against all disasters. “

For the most part, the directive gives HHS authority over the response to health emergencies. It appears to come down on the side of HHS in a number of areas where there has been uncertainty over whether HHS or the Department of Homeland Security was in charge. Both DHS and HHS have biosurveillance programs, for example.

HSPD-21 calls for HHS to field a system “that is predicated on state, regional, and community-level capabilities and creates a networked system to allow for two-way information flow between and among federal, state and local government public health authorities and clinical health care providers.”

It continues: “The system shall build upon existing federal, state and local surveillance systems where they exist and shall enable and provide incentive for public health agencies to implement local surveillance systems where they do not exist. To the extent feasible, the system shall be built using electronic health information systems.”

Within six months, HHS must establish an Epidemiologic Surveillance Federal Advisory Committee in coordination with the departments of Defense, Veterans Affairs and Homeland Security. The committee must include representatives from state and local government public health authorities and appropriate private sector health care entities.

The directive also creates a Cabinet-level Public Health and Medical Preparedness Task Force chaired by the HHS secretary. The task force will develop the implementation plan for the strategy.



upcoming event

Enterprise Architecture 2008 - Washington, DC
September 9 - September 10, 2008

Occupational Health & Safety Executive Summit - Arlington, VA
October 6 - October 7, 2008


 

head
fcw
issue
First Name State
Last Name Zip
Title Email