Search FCW


Subscribe Now!
Table of Contents
Sprint
Business
BPM
CXOs
Columns
Columnists
Defense
E-Government
Elections 2008
Enterprise Architecture
Funding
Homeland Security
Health IT
IPv6
LOB
Management
Procurement
Privacy
Policy
Program Management
State and Local
Security
Technology
Telework
Training and Certification
Workforce

More Topics
resourcecenter
Home
Letters to the Editor
Current Issue/Download
Print/Online Archives
Editorial Calendar
researchstore
resourcecenter
Communications for Continuity Operations

Oracle Resource Center
Networking Communications
Security Directives and Compliance
Data Center Virtualization
Air Force ELSG Contract Guide
Security Management
DOD and Security Guide
Networx Contract Guide
SEWP IV Contract Guide
Priority Report: Virtualization
Priority Report: Networking Services

More >>



Latest News
ADVERTISEMENT





 

Magistrate recommends court order to preserve White House e-mail messages

By Ben Bain
Published on October 19, 2007

Comment

Click here to comment on this article


Related story links

Magistrate's Proposed Order

Group files motion to preserve e-mail backup tapes

Groups press White House on e-mail


Newsletters

You might also be interested in these FCW newsletters:

Daily

To learn more, click here.


A federal magistrate recommended Friday that a federal court issue a temporary restraining order to ensure that White House officials preserve all media thought to contain backup copies of millions of e-mail messages — the subject of ongoing litigation.

A government watchdog group requested the injunction last week in support of its lawsuit alleging that the government did not meet its obligations in adequately protecting e-mail messages since 2003. A judge will now decide whether to issue the order after weighing the recommendations and any objections from the government.

A complaint from Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW) alleges that the government failed to “recover, restore and preserve certain electronic communications created and/or received within the White House” in violation of the Presidential Records Act and/or the Federal Records Act. The defendants are the Executive Office of the President, the White House’s Office of Administration, and the National Archives and Records Administration.

The suggestion comes after an Oct. 17 hearing in which the government said that a court order was unnecessary because it was already preserving all of the relevant backup copies that were in its custody at the time the lawsuit was filed. Instead, the government argued, the administration should issue a declaration from an authorized official promising to preserve all backup media in its possession.

However, in his recommendation to the U.S. District Court judge, the magistrate who heard the testimony agreed with CREW’s argument that a declaration did not protect the backup media from potential destruction to the extent that a court order, which is punishable by contempt charges, does.

The White House has 10 days to file an objection to the recommendation before the judge makes a decision.



upcoming event

Occupational Health & Safety Executive Summit - Arlington, VA
October 6 - October 7, 2008

Top 100 Executive Briefings: Focus on Enterprise Network Security, Fairview Park Marriott in Falls Church, VA 2008
October 9, 2008

Transition 2009, Four Points Sheraton, Washington, DC
October 15, 2008

GCN Awards Gala, Hilton Washington in Washington, D.C.
October 22, 2008


 

head
fcw
issue
First Name State
Last Name Zip
Title Email