Search FCW


Subscribe Now!
Table of Contents
Sprint
Business
BPM
CXOs
Columns
Columnists
Defense
E-Government
Elections 2008
Enterprise Architecture
Funding
Homeland Security
Health IT
IPv6
LOB
Management
Procurement
Privacy
Policy
Program Management
State and Local
Security
Technology
Telework
Training and Certification
Workforce

More Topics
resourcecenter
Home
Letters to the Editor
Current Issue/Download
Print/Online Archives
Editorial Calendar
researchstore
resourcecenter
Communications for Continuity Operations

Oracle Resource Center
NEW! Transforming Data Center
Managed Services
Service Oriented Architecture
Training & Simulation
Networking Communications
Security Directives and Compliance
Data Center Virtualization
Air Force ELSG Contract Guide

More >>



Latest News
ADVERTISEMENT





 

IGs may have to hunt for redundant programs

By Matthew Weigelt
Published on October 3, 2007

Comment

Click here to comment on this article


Related story links

DHS under more scrutiny after attacks

House committee would tighten oversight of Deepwater program

Sun cancels its GSA schedule


Newsletters

You might also be interested in these FCW newsletters:

Daily
Management

To learn more, click here.


Inspectors general would report redundant programs to Congress and the president each year under an amendment to legislation the House passed today.

In addition, IGs would have to include proposed legislation with those reports to encourage Congress to take action on the redundant programs under the measure, the Improving Government Accountability Act. The House passed the bill 404 to 11. It now goes to the Senate.

Rep. Tom Davis (R-Va), who proposed the amendment, asked, "How many more times are we going to have to hear about redundancy in federal programs without doing anything about it?"

For example, eight agencies run 17 separate programs related to rural water and wastewater systems, and each program has a set of regulations, said Davis, ranking member on the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee.

"The primary reason all these federal programs exist in the first place is because Congress has this bad habit of haphazardly establishing new programs to achieve short-term solutions whenever a problem arises," he said.

However, the Bush administration opposes the bill. Officials say several provisions would undermine the president's authority over the executive branch. For example, they disagree with a provision that would prevent the president from removing from office IGs he appointed, except for specific reasons such as being convicted of a felony.

The administration also opposes other provisions:
  • The bill would require IGs to submit a budget request to the Office of Management and Budget in addition to the House and Senate Appropriations committees. Currently, agency budgets include IG spending requests.
  • The bill would also establish a Council of the Inspectors General on Integrity and Efficiency.


"A council would impede the president's ability to react swiftly and effectively to problems with IGs or with the council itself," according to a statement of administration policy.



upcoming event

Green Computing Summit, Ronald Reagan Building, Washington, DC
December 2 - December 3, 2008

Trusted Internet Connection and the Comprehensive National Cyber Security Initiative, The Willard Intercontinental Hotel, Washington, DC
December 4, 2008


 

head
fcw
issue
First Name State
Last Name Zip
Title Email