Search FCW


Subscribe Now!
Table of Contents
Sprint
Business
BPM
CXOs
Columns
Columnists
Defense
E-Government
Elections 2008
Enterprise Architecture
Funding
Homeland Security
Health IT
IPv6
LOB
Management
Procurement
Privacy
Policy
Program Management
State and Local
Security
Technology
Telework
Training and Certification
Workforce

More Topics
resourcecenter
Home
Letters to the Editor
Current Issue/Download
Print/Online Archives
Editorial Calendar
researchstore
resourcecenter
Communications for Continuity Operations

Oracle Resource Center
NEW! Transforming Data Center
Managed Services
Service Oriented Architecture
Training & Simulation
Networking Communications
Security Directives and Compliance
Data Center Virtualization
Air Force ELSG Contract Guide

More >>



Latest News
ADVERTISEMENT





 

Justice audit reveals IT planning shortcomings

By Adam Chandler
Published on August 29, 2007

Comment

Click here to comment on this article


Related story links

IG: Cost data for Justice IT systems not reliable

IG: Cost data for Justice IT systems not reliable


Newsletters

You might also be interested in these FCW newsletters:

Daily
Management

To learn more, click here.


According to the final report in a series of three by the Justice Department’s Office of the Inspector General, Justice officials produced almost no performance evaluations for information technology projects.

The OIG received only seven post-implementation reviews from 38 projects, and four of them did not have information on lessons learned. The office wanted to use the reviews to identify problems with Justice projects.

The multitude of federal regulations for preparing studies of, planning for and evaluating IT projects also caused problems, the report notes. Regulations originate from different sources, such as the Clinger-Cohen Act, and they can prove cumbersome in the IT development process.

Documents submitted to the IG demonstrated compliance with requirements for areas such as business case studies and IT security. But gaps existed between the plans for IT projects and the end results.

Justice noted that problems resulted in cost increases and delays in deploying the FBI’s case management system and caused the termination of the FBI’s Laboratory Information Management System. They also led to delays in launching an interoperable fingerprint identification system for Justice, the Homeland Security and State departments, and state and local law enforcement agencies. Furthermore, the Terrorist Screening Center database suffered from data integrity problems.

To remedy those problems, the OIG recommends that Justice:
  • Evaluate why project teams do not prepare certain plans and evaluations, reassess the utility of those documents, and consider revising the standards for producing IT studies, plans and evaluations for individual projects.
  • Consider revising the guidelines for tailoring work patterns for specific types of projects.
  • Ensure that post-implementation and post-termination evaluations are conducted that focus on lessons learned for project planning and management.
  • Ensure that employees receive training in skills needed to adequately direct and oversee contractor efforts.
  • Perform targeted reviews to improve the use of business process re-engineering and requirements analysis early in the development process.
Chandler is an intern with the 1105 Government Information Group.



upcoming event

Green Computing Summit, Ronald Reagan Building, Washington, DC
December 2 - December 3, 2008

Trusted Internet Connection and the Comprehensive National Cyber Security Initiative, The Willard Intercontinental Hotel, Washington, DC
December 4, 2008


 

head
fcw
issue
First Name State
Last Name Zip
Title Email