Search FCW


Subscribe Now!
Table of Contents
Sprint
Business
BPM
CXOs
Columns
Columnists
Defense
E-Government
Elections 2008
Enterprise Architecture
Funding
Homeland Security
Health IT
IPv6
LOB
Management
Procurement
Privacy
Policy
Program Management
State and Local
Security
Technology
Telework
Training and Certification
Workforce

More Topics
resourcecenter
Home
Letters to the Editor
Current Issue/Download
Print/Online Archives
Editorial Calendar
researchstore
resourcecenter
Communications for Continuity Operations

Oracle Resource Center
NEW! Transforming Data Center
Managed Services
Service Oriented Architecture
Training & Simulation
Networking Communications
Security Directives and Compliance
Data Center Virtualization
Air Force ELSG Contract Guide

More >>



Latest News
ADVERTISEMENT





 

IG: Energy contractors mismanaging IT acquisitions

By Wade-Hahn Chan
Published on June 29, 2007

Comment

Click here to comment on this article


Related story links

Facility Contractor Acquisition and Management of Information Technology Hardware (.pdf)

Energy IG report raises more security concerns

Lab not wiping sensitive data before discarding machines, DOE finds


Newsletters

You might also be interested in these FCW newsletters:

Daily

To learn more, click here.


The Energy Department’s Office of Inspector General has criticized contractor-managed acquisitions, saying contractors failed to oversee sensitive computer hardware at national laboratories and offices.

The IG blamed inconsistent asset management policies in a report released June 26.

DOE reported to Congress in late May that it lost nearly 1,400 laptop computers over the past six years. The IG warned that without a plan to solve problems with how contractors handle equipment at national labs and offices, more equipment could be lost.

“The failure to maintain accountability over computers and other sensitive assets could also increase the risk of misuse, theft or other diversion” of DOE equipment, Friedman stated in a memo attached to the report.

The report stated that not all national sites had consistent policies for tracking computers until disposing of them. The office also found that some labs did not properly wipe sensitive data from computer storage devices before disposing of them.

The IG also said the department “had not developed a coordinated approach to [information technology] hardware acquisition, management and control,” and did not require contractors to adhere to procurement standards developed at local sites and laboratories. This resulted in widely varying costs for equipment. The IG noted that two sites procured the same portable device in a six-month period for prices ranging from $100 to $460.

Procurement contractors should begin using cost-saving acquisition strategies such as volume purchases and consolidated buying, the report stated.

Although managers agreed with the IG’s assessment, the National Nuclear Security Administration did not. In comments about the report, Michael Kane, NNSA’s associate administrator for management and administration, said the agency already has adopted minimum hardware standards.


upcoming event

Green Computing Summit, Ronald Reagan Building, Washington, DC
December 2 - December 3, 2008

Trusted Internet Connection and the Comprehensive National Cyber Security Initiative, The Willard Intercontinental Hotel, Washington, DC
December 4, 2008


 

head
fcw
issue
First Name State
Last Name Zip
Title Email