Search FCW


Subscribe Now!
Table of Contents
Sprint
Business
BPM
CXOs
Columns
Columnists
Defense
E-Government
Elections 2008
Enterprise Architecture
Funding
Homeland Security
Health IT
IPv6
LOB
Management
Procurement
Privacy
Policy
Program Management
State and Local
Security
Technology
Telework
Training and Certification
Workforce

More Topics
resourcecenter
Home
Letters to the Editor
Current Issue/Download
Print/Online Archives
Editorial Calendar
researchstore
resourcecenter
Communications for Continuity Operations

Oracle Resource Center
NEW - Air Force ELSG Contract Guide
NEW - Security Management
NEW - DOD and Security Guide
Networx Contract Guide
SEWP IV Contract Guide
Priority Report: Virtualization
NEW - CHESS formerly ASCP
New - SATCOM II

More >>



Latest News
ADVERTISEMENT





 

Doan's attorney: OSC's report off the mark, unfair

By Matthew Weigelt
Published on June 4, 2007

Comment

Click here to comment on this article


Related story links

Nardotti's response to Bloch (.pdf)

OSC: Doan violated Hatch Act

Nardotti's letter to Bloch (.pdf)

Office of Special Counsel recommends disciplinary action against Doan


Newsletters

You might also be interested in these FCW newsletters:

Daily

To learn more, click here.


A report by the Office of Special Counsel that states Lurita Doan, administrator of the General Services Administration, violated the Hatch Act is far off the mark and unfair and needs to be disregarded, her attorney, Michael Nardotti, wrote in a letter to OSC.

He also wrote that Special Counsel Scott Bloch prepared a premature and prejudicial provision of the draft and final reports, which were leaked to the media.

OSC has an obligation to avoid even the appearance of impropriety, and it must fairly and impartially consider the facts and circumstances, something it has not done in Doan’s case, Nardotti wrote. No one can erase the stigma that now overshadows the case, he added.

According to OSC, Doan violated the Hatch Act when she allegedly asked, “How can we help our candidates?” during a presentation by a White House aide at a lunch meeting at GSA headquarters in January. The act prohibits federal employees from engaging in partisan activity on federal property and during work hours. The aide’s presentation highlighted weak Democratic and Republican candidates in upcoming elections, and OSC believes Doan’s question indicated a desire to help Republicans.

Doan told OSC she didn’t pay much attention during the presentation because she was answering e-mail messages on her Research in Motion BlackBerry. OSC obtained Doan’s personal and government e-mail records and found no evidence that she sent any messages during the 1:30 p.m. to 2:30 p.m. meeting.

But OSC failed to mention the backlog of messages in Doan’s e-mail account, Nardotti wrote. His response states that Doan had received about 220 e-mail messages in the 48 hours leading up to the meeting.

Nardotti also wrote that Bloch’s report lacks any evidence of how the follow-up discussion at the meeting was connected to an election or a candidate.

“Indeed, the only reference to specific, future election campaigns occurred during the formal presentation by the White House representative,” he wrote.

Additionally, Nardotti wrote that OSC targets a single comment — “How can we help our candidates?” — which is disputed even among those who attended the meeting.

Doan’s response was due June 1 so it could accompany Bloch’s investigative report to President Bush, who will make the final decision about Doan’s future as GSA administrator.



upcoming event

Enterprise Architecture 2008 - Washington, DC
September 9 - September 10, 2008

Occupational Health & Safety Executive Summit - Arlington, VA
October 6 - October 7, 2008


 

head
fcw
issue
First Name State
Last Name Zip
Title Email