Search FCW


Subscribe Now!
Table of Contents
Sprint
Business
BPM
CXOs
Columns
Columnists
Defense
E-Government
Elections 2008
Enterprise Architecture
Funding
Homeland Security
Health IT
IPv6
LOB
Management
Procurement
Privacy
Policy
Program Management
State and Local
Security
Technology
Telework
Training and Certification
Workforce

More Topics
resourcecenter
Home
Letters to the Editor
Current Issue/Download
Print/Online Archives
Editorial Calendar
researchstore
resourcecenter
Communications for Continuity Operations

Oracle Resource Center
NEW! Transforming Data Center
Managed Services
Service Oriented Architecture
Training & Simulation
Networking Communications
Security Directives and Compliance
Data Center Virtualization
Air Force ELSG Contract Guide

More >>



Latest News
ADVERTISEMENT





 

GAO: DHS needs to tighten interagency contracting

By FCW Staff
Published on September 29, 2006

Comment

Click here to comment on this article


Newsletters

You might also be interested in these FCW newsletters:

Daily

To learn more, click here.


According to a new report from the Government Accountability Office, the Homeland Security Department is falling short in its management of interagency contracts and failing to monitor its total spending on such contracts.

DHS spent about $6.5 billion on interagency contracts in fiscal 2005, which is about 37 percent of the $17.5 billion in total purchases, the GAO said. The Office of Procurement Operations used the greatest amount of interagency contracting, totaling $3.7 billion.

However, the department has not developed effective guidance on how to ensure good value in such contracts, the report said. Oversight is lagging, especially with regard to General Services Administration schedules and governmentwide acquisition contracts, the report said.

Not all interagency contracts offer good value when considering timeliness and cost. For that reason, as of July 2005, the department has required planning and analysis of alternatives for all acquisitions. Yet in four cases when such planning was required, it was not performed, the GAO said.

“DHS officials said benefits of speed and convenience—not total value including cost—have driven decisions to choose these types of contracts,” the GAO reported. “DHS does not systematically monitor its total spending on interagency contracts and does not assess the outcomes of its use of this contracting method.”

Alice Lipowicz is a staff writer for Government Computer News’ sister publication, Washington Technology.


upcoming event

Green Computing Summit, Ronald Reagan Building, Washington, DC
December 2 - December 3, 2008

Trusted Internet Connection and the Comprehensive National Cyber Security Initiative, The Willard Intercontinental Hotel, Washington, DC
December 4, 2008


 

head
fcw
issue
First Name State
Last Name Zip
Title Email