Search FCW


Subscribe Now!
Table of Contents
Sprint
Business
BPM
CXOs
Columns
Columnists
Defense
E-Government
Elections 2008
Enterprise Architecture
Funding
Homeland Security
Health IT
IPv6
LOB
Management
Procurement
Privacy
Policy
Program Management
State and Local
Security
Technology
Telework
Training and Certification
Workforce

More Topics
resourcecenter
Home
Letters to the Editor
Current Issue/Download
Print/Online Archives
Editorial Calendar
researchstore
resourcecenter
Communications for Continuity Operations

Oracle Resource Center
NEW! Transforming Data Center
Managed Services
Service Oriented Architecture
Training & Simulation
Networking Communications
Security Directives and Compliance
Data Center Virtualization
Air Force ELSG Contract Guide

More >>



Latest News
ADVERTISEMENT





 

DOD promises to follow the rules on business modernization approval

By FCW Staff
Published on June 17, 2005

Comment

Click here to comment on this article


Newsletters

You might also be interested in these FCW newsletters:

Daily

To learn more, click here.


The Government Accountability Office has put the Defense Department’s problematic Business Management Modernization Program on its high-risk list for the last 10 years partly because of Defense agencies’ reluctance to ensure projects abide by DOD’s Business Enterprise Architecture.

Even though Defense policy states that the office in charge of BMMP must approve any project worth more than $1 million, it clearly was not happening enough.

In fact, GAO found that over the last two years DOD spent $651 million on 50 programs that were not reviewed.

But that is all about to change, according to two senior DOD officials.

$1 million threshold

Thomas Modly, deputy undersecretary for Defense financial management, told lawmakers earlier this month the undersecretary of Defense for acquisition, technology and logistics would review every project worth more than $1 million.

Modly testified before the House Government Reform Subcommittee on Government Management, Finance and Accountability that DOD now has the infrastructure in place to perform the reviews and is building a repository to track the projects.

Paul Brinkley, special assistant to the undersecretary of Defense, acquisition, technology and logistics for business transformation, said DOD is developing an automated tool to determine who obligates money for systems and who is to be held accountable.

“We set firm dates for an inventory to be finished,” he said, but didn’t expound on when the inventory would be completed.

The assurances come after GAO auditors found a pervasive problem among all Defense agencies. In 2003, they spent $408 million and in 2004 they spent $243 million, respectively, on unreviewed sign-offs.

The Defense Logistics Agency was the biggest culprit in 2003, spending $168 million without approval, while the Navy pushed $93 million through in 2004 without approval.

Some of the unauthorized programs in 2004 included $57 million for the Navy’s Tactical Command Support System, $25 million for the Air Force’s Integrated Maintenance Data System and $34 million for the Army’s Logistics Modernization Program.

But DOD officials promised the subcommittee that it will correct t
hese problems by Sept. 30.

Congress got tough last year by adding the Anti-Deficiency Act provision to the 2005 National Defense Authorization law. The provision required the head of the BMMP—under threat of a $5,000 fine and jail time for violations—to review all projects worth more than $1 million to make sure the initiatives are aligned with the Business Enterprise Architecture.


upcoming event

Green Computing Summit, Ronald Reagan Building, Washington, DC
December 2 - December 3, 2008

Trusted Internet Connection and the Comprehensive National Cyber Security Initiative, The Willard Intercontinental Hotel, Washington, DC
December 4, 2008


 

head
fcw
issue
First Name State
Last Name Zip
Title Email