Search FCW


Subscribe Now!
Table of Contents
Sprint
Business
BPM
CXOs
Columns
Columnists
Defense
E-Government
Elections 2008
Enterprise Architecture
Funding
Homeland Security
Health IT
IPv6
LOB
Management
Procurement
Privacy
Policy
Program Management
State and Local
Security
Technology
Telework
Training and Certification
Workforce

More Topics
resourcecenter
Home
Letters to the Editor
Current Issue/Download
Print/Online Archives
Editorial Calendar
researchstore
resourcecenter
Communications for Continuity Operations

Oracle Resource Center
NEW! Transforming Data Center
Managed Services
Service Oriented Architecture
Training & Simulation
Networking Communications
Security Directives and Compliance
Data Center Virtualization
Air Force ELSG Contract Guide

More >>



Latest News
ADVERTISEMENT





 

A fine line on LOB

By FCW Staff
Published on June 16, 2005

Comment

Click here to comment on this article


Newsletters

You might also be interested in these FCW newsletters:

Daily

To learn more, click here.


Panel breaks down the fundamentals, and payoffs, of Lines of Business

Agency CIOs face a broad array of issues and concerns in adapting the Office of Management and Budget’s Lines-of-Business initiatives into their enterprise architectures. The Association for Federal Information Resources Management and GCN last month hosted a roundtable discussion to discuss those issues. The 10 participants generally agreed that Lines of Business make sense, while acknowledging that a lot of challenges remain. Among them, the initiatives:
  • help streamline redundant processes and policies, not just IT systems

  • focus agencies, as some companies do, on core missions rather than acillary activities

  • still require a mechanism to address poor performance and give agencies the ability to move to new providers

  • don’t need additional legislative tools, for now, to nurture improvements

  • run the risk that small agencies won’t have the clout of large departments in making business cases

  • depend on good service-level agreements and a competitive pool of service providers

  • still need franchise-type, working capital funds to fully enable LOB transition efforts

  • need to include information sharing as a new LOB.

What follows is an abbreviated version of the discussion. To read more, go to /www.gcn.com and enter 428 into the Quickfind search box.
Tom Temin, editor in chief for GCN and Washington Technology, moderated the discussion.

The participants:

Scott Charbo, Agriculture Department CIO

Linda Cureton, Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives deputy CIO

Larry Gross, Treasury Department acting CIO for e-government

Charles Havekost, Health and Human Services CIO

Randolph Hite, Government Accountability Office director for IT architecture and systems issues

Mark Krzysko, Defense Department deputy director for electronic business, Defense procurement and acquisition policy

Tarrazzia Martin, Immigration and Customs Enforcement CIO

Price Roe, Justice Department special assistant to the CIO

John Sindelar, General Services Administration deputy associate administrator, Office of Governmentwide Policy

Melissa Wojciak, House Government Reform Committee staff director.

TEMIN: There is not a lot known about how Lines of Business will be accepted. What’s your perspective on where we actually stand with picking Lines-of-Business Centers of Excellence and moving toward them?


upcoming event

Green Computing Summit, Ronald Reagan Building, Washington, DC
December 2 - December 3, 2008

Trusted Internet Connection and the Comprehensive National Cyber Security Initiative, The Willard Intercontinental Hotel, Washington, DC
December 4, 2008


 

head
fcw
issue
First Name State
Last Name Zip
Title Email