Search FCW


Subscribe Now!
Table of Contents
Sprint
Business
BPM
CXOs
Columns
Columnists
Defense
E-Government
Elections 2008
Enterprise Architecture
Funding
Homeland Security
Health IT
IPv6
LOB
Management
Procurement
Privacy
Policy
Program Management
State and Local
Security
Technology
Telework
Training and Certification
Workforce

More Topics
resourcecenter
Home
Letters to the Editor
Current Issue/Download
Print/Online Archives
Editorial Calendar
researchstore
resourcecenter
Communications for Continuity Operations

Oracle Resource Center
NEW - Data Center Virtualization
NEW - Air Force ELSG Contract Guide
NEW - Security Management
NEW - DOD and Security Guide
Networx Contract Guide
SEWP IV Contract Guide
Priority Report: Virtualization
NEW - CHESS formerly ASCP
New - SATCOM II

More >>


FCW.com BLOG

Latest News
ADVERTISEMENT





 
The Lectern:

Contracting and the fall of Rome?

By Steve Kelman
Published on May 16, 2007 - 03:59 AM

Comment

Click here to comment on this blog


Newsletters

You might also be interested in these FCW newsletters:

Daily

To learn more, click here.


On a brief one-day stopover at my home in Boston before leaving for a talk at a government procurement conference in Ohio and the annual acquisition research conference at the Naval Postgraduate School in Monterey, Calif., I packed my suitcase with a bunch of magazines that had arrived while I was in Europe -- to read on the plane, at meals when I ate alone and while walking on hotel treadmills.

This morning at the gym in Monterey, I opened the June issue of Vanity Fair, and guess what I saw in the Editor's Letter from Graydon Carter?

"In [an] excerpt from his new book, 'Are We Rome?,' due out in May, [Cullen] Murphy examines one of the underlying causes of the fall of the Roman Empire: privatization. Similarly, Murphy says, the U.S. 'has embarked on a privatization binge like no other in its history.' The firms the work is being outsourced to, he says, not only are taking over nearly every vital function of government but also are unregulated and unaccountable to the public."

Now it's the fall of Rome?

I read the piece by Murphy. It is over the top and very poorly argued -- handed in as a student paper, it wouldn't have gotten a good grade. It should be noted that he also includes under the rubric "privatization" a lot more than just contracting.

Nonetheless, this article is a sign of a new reality about debates about contracting. As I noted in an earlier post, the subject of contracting is so boring that the only way to get any public attention for it is to engage in wild rhetoric, a Don Imus-style public debate.

It is difficult to have a sensible public debate because there are so few sound bites that can be feasibly developed for a sensible position. About the only sound bites on the "other side" involve offensive rhetoric about needing contractors as an alternative to incompetent civil servants, which is no better than the fall of Rome stuff.

Any ideas about dealing with this dilemma?

View Comments

There are currently no comments to display.


Post a Comment

To post a comment, you must be a registered user of FCW.com and be logged in. Use one of the forms below to login or register for FREE to FCW.com. To protect your privacy, you can use an alias as your username.

Login to FCW.com

E-mail Address:
Password:
Forgot your password?
Register and Post Comment

* First Name:
* Last Name:
* E-mail Address:
* Password:
* Retype Password:
* Blog Username:
* Comments:


E-mail me when new comments are posted in this thread?


upcoming event

Enterprise Architecture 2008 - Washington, DC
September 9 - September 10, 2008

Occupational Health & Safety Executive Summit - Arlington, VA
October 6 - October 7, 2008


 

head
fcw
issue
First Name State
Last Name Zip
Title Email