Search FCW


Subscribe Now!
Table of Contents
Sprint
Business
BPM
CXOs
Columns
Columnists
Defense
E-Government
Elections 2008
Enterprise Architecture
Funding
Homeland Security
Health IT
IPv6
LOB
Management
Procurement
Privacy
Policy
Program Management
State and Local
Security
Technology
Telework
Training and Certification
Workforce

More Topics
resourcecenter
Home
Letters to the Editor
Current Issue/Download
Print/Online Archives
Editorial Calendar
researchstore
resourcecenter
Communications for Continuity Operations

Oracle Resource Center
NEW! Transforming Data Center
Managed Services
Service Oriented Architecture
Training & Simulation
Networking Communications
Security Directives and Compliance
Data Center Virtualization
Air Force ELSG Contract Guide

More >>


FCW.com BLOG

Latest News
ADVERTISEMENT





 
The Lectern:

The Lectern: Prediction markets and government management

By Steve Kelman
Published on April 10, 2008 - 04:00 PM

Comment

Click here to comment on this blog


Newsletters

You might also be interested in these FCW newsletters:

Daily

To learn more, click here.


I have written a few columns, and spoken with some government IT managers, about the idea of using so-called "prediction markets" as a tool to improve government performance, particularly for managing big IT (or other) projects. Wednesday's New York Times actually ran a long article -- "Betting to Improve the Odds" -- on the growing use of prediction markets inside businesses, by cutting-edge firms such as Cisco, GE, and Google.

In prediction markets, people put cash on predicting various outcomes. The "price" of a prediction will go up and down, depending on how much money people are willing to place on the prediction -- the higher the price, the more likely the outcome is considered to be. Prediction markets thus make use of the "wisdom of crowds" idea.

Prediction markets have gotten a lot of attention in elections, where they have often been more accurate than polls or pundits in predicting election results; there was also an unfortunate incident a few years ago when an innovative effort in the government to use prediction markets to glean information on the likelihood of various events (such as specific terrorist attacks) was squashed amidst an ignorant political uproar.

The most obvious use for prediction markets inside government is to get better estimates of the actual cost, schedule, or performance on big projects, such as IT projects. When this has been tried out in companies, the predictions about schedule coming out of these prediction markets have been superior to those made by subordinate managers to their bosses. The Times article cites predictions about when a company's new stores in China would be open that were far more pessimistic than what senior management was told, and that enabled corrective measures that reduced the delays. One could also imagine prediction markets on the likely success of new organizational change initiatives, as one way to pre-test the probable viability of different ideas.

Who's going to be the pioneer for trying this idea out in government management?

By the way, for new blog readers (and old ones who may have forgotten or never known) -- I try to post on Tuesdays and Thursdays whenever possible.

View Comments

Perhaps, it is a good way for citizens to participate in the public management, especially the government management. Moreover, government could glean more information from public and improve the efficiency and performance at the same time. But I wonder whether subjective prediction may intentionally influence the results. That is to say, people may not “buy what they think will happen” but “buy what he/she hopes happen”. The policy issues are much more different from sports issues and the like. Perhaps, I don’t know exactly what prediction market is. At least, I browse the Chinese website, and found little information for prediction market.

Posted by walterlee on April 13, 2008 - 03:53 AM

Walter, thanks for posting! Nice to hear from a blog reader from mainland China -- I know from emails I receive this blog has some mainland China readers, but you are the first to post.

Yes, one could also imagine versions of prediction markets that could be used to gather information from the public. And yes, people might bet on what they want to happen rather than what will happen. But the theory is that if people are betting their own money, they (or most of them) will give their best possible judgment.

If you want to learn more, one of the academics who has written most about prediction markets is a young scholar at the University of Pennsylvania named Justin Wolfers. Google his name and check out some of his papers!

Best, Steve Kelman

Posted by jsmeditor on April 13, 2008 - 03:07 PM

Good post Steve. We're starting to get a group together at my work to work on a number of these issues. I got a bunch of ideas up my sleeve - it should be interesting to watch.

Posted by sressler on April 15, 2008 - 09:22 PM

Dear Steve Ressler -- Thanks for your post and for everything you're doing involving young feds. Yeah, you guys need to run with improved ways for the government to do its job, whether by using prediction markets or any other ideas you come up with. What group are you talking about that's discussing this?

Best Steve Kelman

Posted by jsmeditor on April 16, 2008 - 02:00 PM


Post a Comment

To post a comment, you must be a registered user of FCW.com and be logged in. Use one of the forms below to login or register for FREE to FCW.com. To protect your privacy, you can use an alias as your username.

Login to FCW.com

E-mail Address:
Password:
Forgot your password?
Register and Post Comment

* First Name:
* Last Name:
* E-mail Address:
* Password:
* Retype Password:
* Blog Username:
* Comments:


E-mail me when new comments are posted in this thread?


upcoming event

Green Computing Summit, Ronald Reagan Building, Washington, DC
December 2 - December 3, 2008

Trusted Internet Connection and the Comprehensive National Cyber Security Initiative, The Willard Intercontinental Hotel, Washington, DC
December 4, 2008


 

head
fcw
issue
First Name State
Last Name Zip
Title Email