Search FCW


Subscribe Now!
Table of Contents
Sprint
Business
BPM
CXOs
Columns
Columnists
Defense
E-Government
Elections 2008
Enterprise Architecture
Funding
Homeland Security
Health IT
IPv6
LOB
Management
Procurement
Privacy
Policy
Program Management
State and Local
Security
Technology
Telework
Training and Certification
Workforce

More Topics
resourcecenter
Home
Letters to the Editor
Current Issue/Download
Print/Online Archives
Editorial Calendar
researchstore
resourcecenter
Communications for Continuity Operations

Oracle Resource Center
NEW - Data Center Virtualization
NEW - Air Force ELSG Contract Guide
NEW - Security Management
NEW - DOD and Security Guide
Networx Contract Guide
SEWP IV Contract Guide
Priority Report: Virtualization
NEW - CHESS formerly ASCP
New - SATCOM II

More >>


FCW.com BLOG

Latest News
ADVERTISEMENT





 
Culture and Context:

When seeing (I mean, authenticating) is believing

By Susan Miller
Published on May 16, 2006 - 03:53 AM

Comment

Click here to comment on this blog


Newsletters

You might also be interested in these FCW newsletters:

Daily

To learn more, click here.


Via BeSpacific, comes this article from the National Law Journal: Digital Data Integrity: Crucial in Duke Case. The media frenzy surrounding the rape allegations against the Duke lacrosse team has lawyers demonstrating their ignorance about data authentication on TV talks shows.

According to the article, some of the evidence includes a time-stamped digital photo and an email (with header), both of which the authors contend, could have been tampered with. This possibility never enters the discussion when the case is tried in the media.

The authors say that in the legal profession, which is grounded in the printed word, “it is difficult to alter documents or images, and forged documents are easily detected.” Even though that's not the case in electronic world, old assumptions die hard.

Just about every great corporate meltdown of the past five years has contained a tale or two about document mismanagement, tampering, forgery or destruction. The anecdotes have shed much-needed light on an open secret long known to those in the information technology field: The integrity of all electronic documentation is remarkably easy to corrupt, intentionally or unintentionally, without notice.

There are solutions to this legal dilemma. There are various services, policies and products that can protect parties from unwanted records manipulation and certify the authenticity of electronic information. Technologies such as third-party trusted timestamps are able to prove that an electronic record existed at a specific point in time and has not been altered since. Without a records management system in place by which digital data may be authenticated, it is very difficult for litigants or disputing parties to prove the integrity of timestamps and associated metadata.


View Comments

There are currently no comments to display.


Post a Comment

To post a comment, you must be a registered user of FCW.com and be logged in. Use one of the forms below to login or register for FREE to FCW.com. To protect your privacy, you can use an alias as your username.

Login to FCW.com

E-mail Address:
Password:
Forgot your password?
Register and Post Comment

* First Name:
* Last Name:
* E-mail Address:
* Password:
* Retype Password:
* Blog Username:
* Comments:


E-mail me when new comments are posted in this thread?


upcoming event

Enterprise Architecture 2008 - Washington, DC
September 9 - September 10, 2008

Occupational Health & Safety Executive Summit - Arlington, VA
October 6 - October 7, 2008


 

head
fcw
issue
First Name State
Last Name Zip
Title Email