Search FCW


Subscribe Now!
Table of Contents
Sprint
Business
BPM
CXOs
Columns
Columnists
Defense
E-Government
Elections 2008
Enterprise Architecture
Funding
Homeland Security
Health IT
IPv6
LOB
Management
Procurement
Privacy
Policy
Program Management
State and Local
Security
Technology
Telework
Training and Certification
Workforce

More Topics
resourcecenter
Home
Letters to the Editor
Current Issue/Download
Print/Online Archives
Editorial Calendar
researchstore
resourcecenter
Communications for Continuity Operations

Oracle Resource Center
NEW! Transforming Data Center
Managed Services
Service Oriented Architecture
Training & Simulation
Networking Communications
Security Directives and Compliance
Data Center Virtualization
Air Force ELSG Contract Guide

More >>


FCW.com BLOG

Latest News
ADVERTISEMENT





 
Culture and Context:

FISA: Old(ish) law in a new(er) world

By Susan Miller
Published on July 27, 2006 - 03:54 AM

Comment

Click here to comment on this blog


Newsletters

You might also be interested in these FCW newsletters:

Daily

To learn more, click here.


The Senate Judiciary Committee held a hearing this week on FISA for the 21st Century. Several people testified, among them was Bryan Cunningham, information security and privacy lawyer and principal at Morgan & Cunningham, LLC. I’d heard Cunningham before on a fascinating podcast entitled "The Digital Spy: How Technology is Changing the Intelligence Community" from a session at the Council on Foreign Relations. Audio and transcript here.

Bryan Cunningham’s June 26 testimony addressed whether the current FISA was applicable, given today’s technology. One of his points (about two-thirds of the way down) is that the 1978 FISA is problematic because it depends on being able to determine

* Whether the collection of information takes place within the United States or overseas and

* Whether or not a potential target is a U.S. person (citizen or permanent resident alien)


According to Cunningham (from the Council on Foreign Relations session):

The first is, was the information collected inside the United States physically, geographically, or not? … That way to divide up the world probably made perfect sense in 1978, and perhaps for some years after that. But with the Internet, with Skype-encrypted telephone calls that can be had from anywhere worldwide, with the ability to sit in Iraq or Afghanistan and be on an Internet service provider in California, all of those legal distinctions that are based on geography, in my judgment, have become and are becoming increasingly outdated.

And similarly the U.S. person issue: How do you determine if you’re thinking about listening in to a Skype-encrypted phone call that you don’t know where on the globe it’s taking place, how do you determine that the person you may be wanting to listen to is or is not a U.S. person? So those legal distinctions, it seems to me, need to be looked at and need to be retooled for the 21st century.


How can you argue with that?

View Comments

There are currently no comments to display.


Post a Comment

To post a comment, you must be a registered user of FCW.com and be logged in. Use one of the forms below to login or register for FREE to FCW.com. To protect your privacy, you can use an alias as your username.

Login to FCW.com

E-mail Address:
Password:
Forgot your password?
Register and Post Comment

* First Name:
* Last Name:
* E-mail Address:
* Password:
* Retype Password:
* Blog Username:
* Comments:


E-mail me when new comments are posted in this thread?


upcoming event

Green Computing Summit, Ronald Reagan Building, Washington, DC
December 2 - December 3, 2008

Trusted Internet Connection and the Comprehensive National Cyber Security Initiative, The Willard Intercontinental Hotel, Washington, DC
December 4, 2008


 

head
fcw
issue
First Name State
Last Name Zip
Title Email