Search FCW


Subscribe Now!
Table of Contents
Sprint
Business
BPM
CXOs
Columns
Columnists
Defense
E-Government
Elections 2008
Enterprise Architecture
Funding
Homeland Security
Health IT
IPv6
LOB
Management
Procurement
Privacy
Policy
Program Management
State and Local
Security
Technology
Telework
Training and Certification
Workforce

More Topics
resourcecenter
Home
Letters to the Editor
Current Issue/Download
Print/Online Archives
Editorial Calendar
researchstore
resourcecenter
Communications for Continuity Operations

Oracle Resource Center
NEW - Data Center Virtualization
NEW - Air Force ELSG Contract Guide
NEW - Security Management
NEW - DOD and Security Guide
Networx Contract Guide
SEWP IV Contract Guide
Priority Report: Virtualization
NEW - CHESS formerly ASCP
New - SATCOM II

More >>


FCW.com BLOG

Latest News
ADVERTISEMENT





 
Culture and Context:

High Cost of Security

By Susan Miller
Published on June 9, 2005 - 03:47 AM

Comment

Click here to comment on this blog


Newsletters

You might also be interested in these FCW newsletters:

Daily

To learn more, click here.


Today's New York Times contains an article about a Department of Homeland Security Inspector General's report that found that many of DHS’s computer systems (19 representative sites were audited) did not have adequate disaster recovery sites or plans.

The audited systems, referred to as Component A through Component J (the real names have been redacted), pointed to a lack of funds as the main reason the facilities didn’t have disaster recovery sites. In fact, the IG’s first recommendation is that the CIO “allocate funds needed to implement an enterprise-wide disaster recovery program for mission critical systems.�

The irony of the report won’t be lost on anyone. It’s embarrassing to be caught unprepared, especially so for the agency in charge of preparedness. But often the cost of that preparation seems unreasonably high – until you consider the cost of not being prepared for a real disaster.

Former Secret Service agent Joseph Petro writes in his book, Standing Next to History, of the elaborate preparation and backup plans required to protect the President. There are agents with the President, ahead at his next stop, at the nearest trauma hospital. There are backup cars, planes, communications systems and contingency plans for every imaginable emergency. Petro writes that when President Reagan traveled to China, he landed with 19 planes and 900 people.

That's a lot of money to protect one person, but if anything were to happen to the President, it wouldn't have been enough. Homeland security is a HUGE job that's always under scrutiny. Backups and redundancy aren't as sexy as x-ray scanners, but they are undeniably more important.

View Comments

There are currently no comments to display.


Post a Comment

To post a comment, you must be a registered user of FCW.com and be logged in. Use one of the forms below to login or register for FREE to FCW.com. To protect your privacy, you can use an alias as your username.

Login to FCW.com

E-mail Address:
Password:
Forgot your password?
Register and Post Comment

* First Name:
* Last Name:
* E-mail Address:
* Password:
* Retype Password:
* Blog Username:
* Comments:


E-mail me when new comments are posted in this thread?


upcoming event

Enterprise Architecture 2008 - Washington, DC
September 9 - September 10, 2008

Occupational Health & Safety Executive Summit - Arlington, VA
October 6 - October 7, 2008


 

head
fcw
issue
First Name State
Last Name Zip
Title Email