Search FCW


Subscribe Now!
Table of Contents
Sprint
Business
BPM
CXOs
Columns
Columnists
Defense
E-Government
Elections 2008
Enterprise Architecture
Funding
Homeland Security
Health IT
IPv6
LOB
Management
Procurement
Privacy
Policy
Program Management
State and Local
Security
Technology
Telework
Training and Certification
Workforce

More Topics
resourcecenter
Home
Letters to the Editor
Current Issue/Download
Print/Online Archives
Editorial Calendar
researchstore
resourcecenter
Communications for Continuity Operations

Oracle Resource Center
Networking Communications
Security Directives and Compliance
Data Center Virtualization
Air Force ELSG Contract Guide
Security Management
DOD and Security Guide
Networx Contract Guide
SEWP IV Contract Guide
Priority Report: Virtualization
Priority Report: Networking Services

More >>


FCW.com BLOG

Latest News
ADVERTISEMENT





 
Culture and Context:

Find easy answers outside the Beltway

By Susan Miller
Published on November 17, 2006 - 03:56 AM

Comment

Click here to comment on this blog


Newsletters

You might also be interested in these FCW newsletters:

Daily

To learn more, click here.


FCW has followed the travails of the Defense Travel System for years. The latest story, Senate threatens to cut DTS funding describes a hearing where Sen. Norm Coleman (R-Minn.) said he plans to introduce legislation to kill the travel portion of the system, leaving the backend accounting system intact. The article covers evaluations of DTS and various ways the program has been funded. The Federal Times version carries more of the discussion between Sen. Coleman and David Chu, undersecretary of Defense for personnel and readiness, who explained how and why DTS was falling short of expectations.

But take a look at the AP version of the same hearing: It Sounded Like A Good Idea... The author has written a sensational lead that totally biases readers:

The Pentagon that gave taxpayers a $434 hammer and a $600 toilet seat cover now has a half-billion-dollar travel booking system that is bypassed by more than eight in 10 users.


The general population reads something like that and thinks, "I agree, another huge waste of money by DOD," and they move on. They don’t get the part about department-wide travel management controls, about projects with evolving expectations and technologies. They think that if grandma can book a cheap flight on Travelocity or Expedia, then why can’t DOD do the same?

I’m not saying that DTS is without significant problems, but I really take issue with categorizations and sound bytes that distill complex problems into one-sentence proclamations. It’s dishonest and it promotes intellectual laziness.

View Comments

There are currently no comments to display.


Post a Comment

To post a comment, you must be a registered user of FCW.com and be logged in. Use one of the forms below to login or register for FREE to FCW.com. To protect your privacy, you can use an alias as your username.

Login to FCW.com

E-mail Address:
Password:
Forgot your password?
Register and Post Comment

* First Name:
* Last Name:
* E-mail Address:
* Password:
* Retype Password:
* Blog Username:
* Comments:


E-mail me when new comments are posted in this thread?


upcoming event

Transition 2009, Four Points Sheraton, Washington, DC
October 15, 2008

GCN Awards Gala, Hilton Washington in Washington, D.C.
October 22, 2008


 

head
fcw
issue
First Name State
Last Name Zip
Title Email