Search FCW


Subscribe Now!
Table of Contents
Sprint
Business
BPM
CXOs
Columns
Columnists
Defense
E-Government
Elections 2008
Enterprise Architecture
Funding
Homeland Security
Health IT
IPv6
LOB
Management
Procurement
Privacy
Policy
Program Management
State and Local
Security
Technology
Telework
Training and Certification
Workforce

More Topics
resourcecenter
Home
Letters to the Editor
Current Issue/Download
Print/Online Archives
Editorial Calendar
researchstore
resourcecenter
Communications for Continuity Operations

Oracle Resource Center
NEW! Transforming Data Center
Managed Services
Service Oriented Architecture
Training & Simulation
Networking Communications
Security Directives and Compliance
Data Center Virtualization
Air Force ELSG Contract Guide

More >>


FCW.com BLOG

Latest News
ADVERTISEMENT





 
Letters to the Editor:

More contracting laws will cost taxpayers

By Stephanie Kanowitz
Published on August 24, 2007 - 04:01 AM

Comment

Click here to comment on this blog


Newsletters

You might also be interested in these FCW newsletters:

Daily

To learn more, click here.


In regard to "Military brass: Acquisition rules can't keep up with IT needs," welcome to 1984. Back to the future. Déjà vu all over again. Groundhog Day. All of these describe the direction our distinguished lawmakers have been taking us the past three years. These were the reasons for programs such as the Federal Information Systems Support Program and FAST to begin with. The General Services Administration's Federal Technology Service and the truly effective Information Technology Fund came out of these same types of federal procurement regulations and restrictions.

New ways of operating and thinking were needed then and they happened. Unfortunately, success breeds detractors, errors were committed and elevated to national scrutiny, and the government lost one of the best means of contracting America had ever known. Yes, inspector general reports unearthed some misinterpretations of contracting law and some actual abuses, but one story never told was how effective overall GSA's contracting means were in meeting the country’s IT needs, both in and out the Defense Department. Five percent of the total contracting dollars may have been in error, and this is certainly a good deal of money. But the other side of that same coin is that 95 percent of the contracting dollars resulted in excellent service and products to meet the country’s needs.

By focusing on the hanging chad of contractual errors, our lawmakers continue to attach anchors to the contracting process. And all of this additional lawmaking to increase contracting oversight has one major inescapable effect: It will cost the taxpayer money. Period. Back to the future.

Bill Johnson

View Comments

There are currently no comments to display.


Post a Comment

To post a comment, you must be a registered user of FCW.com and be logged in. Use one of the forms below to login or register for FREE to FCW.com. To protect your privacy, you can use an alias as your username.

Login to FCW.com

E-mail Address:
Password:
Forgot your password?
Register and Post Comment

* First Name:
* Last Name:
* E-mail Address:
* Password:
* Retype Password:
* Blog Username:
* Comments:


E-mail me when new comments are posted in this thread?


upcoming event

Green Computing Summit, Ronald Reagan Building, Washington, DC
December 2 - December 3, 2008

Trusted Internet Connection and the Comprehensive National Cyber Security Initiative, The Willard Intercontinental Hotel, Washington, DC
December 4, 2008


 

head
fcw
issue
First Name State
Last Name Zip
Title Email