Search FCW


Subscribe Now!
Table of Contents
Sprint
Business
BPM
CXOs
Columns
Columnists
Defense
E-Government
Elections 2008
Enterprise Architecture
Funding
Homeland Security
Health IT
IPv6
LOB
Management
Procurement
Privacy
Policy
Program Management
State and Local
Security
Technology
Telework
Training and Certification
Workforce

More Topics
resourcecenter
Home
Letters to the Editor
Current Issue/Download
Print/Online Archives
Editorial Calendar
researchstore
resourcecenter
Communications for Continuity Operations

Oracle Resource Center
Networking Communications
Security Directives and Compliance
Data Center Virtualization
Air Force ELSG Contract Guide
Security Management
DOD and Security Guide
Networx Contract Guide
SEWP IV Contract Guide
Priority Report: Virtualization
Priority Report: Networking Services

More >>


FCW.com BLOG

Latest News
ADVERTISEMENT





 
Letters to the Editor:

Letter: USPS has chosen a losing strategy

Published on January 22, 2008 - 06:13 PM

Comment

Click here to comment on this blog


Newsletters

You might also be interested in these FCW newsletters:

Daily
Management

To learn more, click here.


Regarding “IT crucial to USPS’ updated business strategy”: There are three areas of this article that need to be addressed. The first is the fact that the U.S. Postal Service includes managers and executives in its operating costs. Only when it suits them are these two groups even mentioned in the same breath with other postal workers. To include them in this area is not only to be deceptive and dishonest, it is unethical.

Second: Wouldn't USPS want to work out the multitude of kinks in the Delivery Point Sequencing system before implementing the Flats Sequencing System? DPS has not only fallen way short of expectations, it has created many more problems that are not only being swept under the rug but are deceptively being used against those who are forced to use the system, namely the career carriers and clerks.

Third: If bar codes are so unique, if they are so necessary, why can't USPS track each piece of mail? There are countless times I have called the post office to find a package or letter, and they don't know where it has been or where it is going or where in fact it is. The main purpose of the bar codes is to track the carrier on his route. At points along their routes, they have to scan to prove where they are. And USPS executives want to contract out mail delivery? They can't trust their own employees -- how will they ever trust outside contractors?

This is another area that puts money in the pockets of the executives and separates them from other postal workers.

Jo Allen


What do you think? Paste a comment in the box below (registration required), or send your comment to letters@fcw.com (subject line: Blog comment) and we'll post it.

View Comments

First - It has always been a problem with ANY Fed agency to always make themselves look good when they need/want to, and it benefits them. It is almost like the "inside the beltway" syndrome that besets Congress.

Second - From the management perspective, it is always much easier to NOT get the bugs worked out of a system, so they can continue to point to it as "the problem" with employees. They always have their meetings with employees to air their grievances and complaints, and then get their ideas and suggestions, and then put them in the trash once they have made it look like they are concerned and are going to try to fix some of the problems. Managers try to make it look like they are on the employees' side, when they are just trying to deflate the employees' concerns and issues so it does not come back around for a while. It makes them look like they are doing something about the concerns, when they are just sweeping them under the carpet, to hopefully not be heard of again.

Third - They should fix the bar code system to work correctly, the way it should, but that will cost money, so they look at a new system instead, while continuing to blame the employees for not doing the job as efficiently as the managers and executives think they should. This gives them more "supposed bullets" to go out and try to contract out the mail carrier jobs.

I feel strongly about this, it is just like any other agency that hinders progress, which is the opposite of congress!! I have 2 brothers that work for USPS, and they work hard!

Thank you, Dan Garfield

Posted by jsmeditor on January 25, 2008 - 11:57 AM

It's always frustrating when new technology is introduced and it's not easy for craft or management. There aren't enough barcodes in the world to give unique numbers to every piece of mail. The volume is mind boggling. I suspect that these comments are a cry of frustration as we're dragged screaming and kicking into the 21st century.get over it!

Posted by Heather Lee on February 20, 2008 - 06:30 AM

Beautifull design Thanks, webmaster.

Posted by Ipod Nana Online on August 25, 2008 - 07:15 PM

Cool blog Thanks, webmaster.

Posted by best savings accounts us on August 26, 2008 - 12:25 PM


Post a Comment

To post a comment, you must be a registered user of FCW.com and be logged in. Use one of the forms below to login or register for FREE to FCW.com. To protect your privacy, you can use an alias as your username.

Login to FCW.com

E-mail Address:
Password:
Forgot your password?
Register and Post Comment

* First Name:
* Last Name:
* E-mail Address:
* Password:
* Retype Password:
* Blog Username:
* Comments:


E-mail me when new comments are posted in this thread?


upcoming event

Transition 2009, Four Points Sheraton, Washington, DC
October 15, 2008

GCN Awards Gala, Hilton Washington in Washington, D.C.
October 22, 2008


 

head
fcw
issue
First Name State
Last Name Zip
Title Email