Search FCW


Subscribe Now!
Table of Contents
Sprint
Business
BPM
CXOs
Columns
Columnists
Defense
E-Government
Elections 2008
Enterprise Architecture
Funding
Homeland Security
Health IT
IPv6
LOB
Management
Procurement
Privacy
Policy
Program Management
State and Local
Security
Technology
Telework
Training and Certification
Workforce

More Topics
resourcecenter
Home
Letters to the Editor
Current Issue/Download
Print/Online Archives
Editorial Calendar
researchstore
resourcecenter
Communications for Continuity Operations

Oracle Resource Center
Networking Communications
Security Directives and Compliance
Data Center Virtualization
Air Force ELSG Contract Guide
Security Management
DOD and Security Guide
Networx Contract Guide
SEWP IV Contract Guide
Priority Report: Virtualization
Priority Report: Networking Services

More >>


FCW.com BLOG

Latest News
ADVERTISEMENT





 
Letters to the Editor:

Letter: FCW ignores serious questions about enhanced driver's license

Published on December 7, 2007 - 03:12 PM

Comment

Click here to comment on this blog


Newsletters

You might also be interested in these FCW newsletters:

Daily
Homeland Security

To learn more, click here.


Regarding “Arizona signs on for enhanced driver's licenses,” it continues to trouble me that nobody reporting on enhanced driver's licenses as state after state enters into agreements with the Homeland Security Department is asking questions about how these driver’s licenses are going to work and just how they provide better security at our borders.

The government has provided no details about how states and the federal government are going to share information and verify citizenship; how the Western Hemisphere Travel Initiative identification number in the radio frequency identification chips -- the equivalent of a Social Security number for international travel -- will be issued, protected and read at the border; or even whether all current driver's license holders are eligible to receive an enhanced license or only those people born in the state where they apply. For states to justify these agreements because they are worried about the Dec 31, 2009, deadline without a public vetting of how enhanced licenses are going to work is tantamount to seeing a light at the end of the tunnel and ignoring what might be at the other end.

If Federal Computer Week isn't asking these questions, who will?

Randy Vanderhoof
Smart Card Alliance

What do you think? Paste a comment in the box below (registration required), or send your comment to letters@fcw.com (subject line: Blog comment) and we'll post it.

View Comments

Mr. Vanderhoof:

I believe you are at a significant disadvantage. The checks and balances in government are no longer working. The media no longer questions the diatribe issued by the Department of Homeland Security for fear of being labelled 'unpatriotic'. The Government Accountability Office no longer probes any deeper than senior leadership, and the public servants who may witness potential fraud, waste or abuse, are no longer protected from recrimination. Your comments fall on deaf ears. As witnessed by...well you are the only commentor.

Posted by Anonymous on December 13, 2007 - 07:37 PM


Post a Comment

To post a comment, you must be a registered user of FCW.com and be logged in. Use one of the forms below to login or register for FREE to FCW.com. To protect your privacy, you can use an alias as your username.

Login to FCW.com

E-mail Address:
Password:
Forgot your password?
Register and Post Comment

* First Name:
* Last Name:
* E-mail Address:
* Password:
* Retype Password:
* Blog Username:
* Comments:


E-mail me when new comments are posted in this thread?


upcoming event

Transition 2009, Four Points Sheraton, Washington, DC
October 15, 2008

GCN Awards Gala, Hilton Washington in Washington, D.C.
October 22, 2008


 

head
fcw
issue
First Name State
Last Name Zip
Title Email