Search FCW


Subscribe Now!
Table of Contents
Sprint
Business
BPM
CXOs
Columns
Columnists
Defense
E-Government
Elections 2008
Enterprise Architecture
Funding
Homeland Security
Health IT
IPv6
LOB
Management
Procurement
Privacy
Policy
Program Management
State and Local
Security
Technology
Telework
Training and Certification
Workforce

More Topics
resourcecenter
Home
Letters to the Editor
Current Issue/Download
Print/Online Archives
Editorial Calendar
researchstore
resourcecenter
Communications for Continuity Operations

Oracle Resource Center
NEW - Security Management
NEW - DOD and Security Guide
Networx Contract Guide
SEWP IV Contract Guide
Priority Report: Virtualization
NEW! CHESS formerly ASCP
New - SATCOM II

More >>


FCW.com BLOG

Latest News
ADVERTISEMENT





 
Letters to the Editor:

Letter: Higher-level politics impede COTRs

Published on December 5, 2007 - 04:09 PM

Comment

Click here to comment on this blog


Newsletters

You might also be interested in these FCW newsletters:

Daily
Management

To learn more, click here.


Regarding “OFPP: Better training gets results,” all too often what contracting officer's technical representatives (COTRs) accept is dictated by politics at a higher level. While working at another agency and as an assistant COTR, I was threatened by my director when I suggested that a white paper written by a contractor contained information that wasn't factual.

My director was the COTR, but I had all the technical knowledge. He went on vacation after the white paper was put on his desk and wasn't going to be back in time to provide a timely response. I sent a letter to our headquarters suggesting that it not accept the white paper. The chief information officer’s office called my director on vacation in Hawaii and got him to override my recommendation. 

Anonymous
Defense Finance and Accounting Service

What do you think? Paste a comment in the box below (registration required), or send your comment to letters@fcw.com (subject line: Blog comment) and we'll post it.

View Comments

I can only say that in 20 years of contracting, most of the flagrant lack of ethics that actually has an impact on the acquisition process has been on the government side. The gains to the habitual violators seem very hard to determine - other than cheap internal political points. I think COs and COTRs who violate the law in overseeing taxpayer money ought to be shot.

Posted by Federal Enterprise Architect on December 7, 2007 - 09:00 AM

"Mikeys". Could the OFFP chief be any more offensive? So much for the Acquisition Team. Good Leaders drive high performing teams but this is not leadership. OFPP needs new leadership that doesn't denigrate members of the team.

Posted by Seenbothsides on December 8, 2007 - 11:13 AM


Post a Comment

To post a comment, you must be a registered user of FCW.com and be logged in. Use one of the forms below to login or register for FREE to FCW.com. To protect your privacy, you can use an alias as your username.

Login to FCW.com

E-mail Address:
Password:
Forgot your password?
Register and Post Comment

* First Name:
* Last Name:
* E-mail Address:
* Password:
* Retype Password:
* Blog Username:
* Comments:


E-mail me when new comments are posted in this thread?


upcoming event

Enterprise Architecture 2008 - Washington, DC
September 9 - September 10, 2008

Occupational Health & Safety Executive Summit - Arlington, VA
October 6 - October 7, 2008


 

head
fcw
issue
First Name State
Last Name Zip
Title Email