Search FCW


Subscribe Now!
Table of Contents
Sprint
Business
BPM
CXOs
Columns
Columnists
Defense
E-Government
Elections 2008
Enterprise Architecture
Funding
Homeland Security
Health IT
IPv6
LOB
Management
Procurement
Privacy
Policy
Program Management
State and Local
Security
Technology
Telework
Training and Certification
Workforce

More Topics
resourcecenter
Home
Letters to the Editor
Current Issue/Download
Print/Online Archives
Editorial Calendar
researchstore
resourcecenter
Communications for Continuity Operations

Oracle Resource Center
Networking Communications
Security Directives and Compliance
Data Center Virtualization
Air Force ELSG Contract Guide
Security Management
DOD and Security Guide
Networx Contract Guide
SEWP IV Contract Guide
Priority Report: Virtualization
Priority Report: Networking Services

More >>



Latest News
ADVERTISEMENT





 

GAO: DHS fails to deliver plan for Congress' oversight of US-VISIT

By Brian Robinson
Published on February 16, 2007

Comment

Click here to comment on this article


Related story links

Planned Expenditures for U.S. Visitor and Immigrant Status Program Need to Be Adequately Defined and Justified [.pdf]

US-VISIT program offers no exit

Senate panel concerned about holes in US-VISIT

GAO: US-VISIT still needs work


Newsletters

You might also be interested in these FCW newsletters:

Daily

To learn more, click here.


Despite improvements in several areas, the Homeland Security Department has so far failed to deliver a spending plan and supporting data that would allow Congress to perform adequate oversight of the U.S. Visitor and Immigrant Status Indicator Technology (US-VISIT) program, according to the Government Accountability Office.

In a review of how well the department has complied with mandates laid out in the DHS Appropriations Act of 2006, GAO said DHS had satisfied several requirements but only partially met others.

DHS still does not meet the requirement that US-VISIT comply with the department’s enterprise architecture, for example. It had also only partially met recommendations that its spending plan for the program fully disclose how the US-VISIT acquisition is being managed, and that it fully disclose the program’s cost, schedule, capabilities and benefits.

GAO said it had two other concerns: DHS has not adequately defined and justified its fiscal 2006 plans for US-VISIT pilot and demonstration projects, and the department has continued to invest in the program without showing how it fits operationally with border security and immigration enforcement initiatives.

Overall, GAO said, the US-VISIT fiscal 2006 expenditure and program information “do not provide a sufficient basis for Congress to exercise effective oversight of the program.”

Steven Pecinovsky, director of the DHS Departmental GAO/Office of Inspector General Liaison Office, agreed with GAO’s findings. He pointed out in a written response that a revised plan had been submitted to the House and Senate Appropriations committees. The plan contained the more accurate attribution of costs that GAO had called for in its report, he said.

GAO also recommended that DHS limit further spending on pilot tests and demonstrations until each could be justified as part of a well-defined evaluation plan, and that the US-VISIT program director work more closely with the DHS Enterprise Architecture Board to mitigate program risk involved in any new spending.


upcoming event

Transition 2009, Four Points Sheraton, Washington, DC
October 15, 2008

GCN Awards Gala, Hilton Washington in Washington, D.C.
October 22, 2008


 

head
fcw
issue
First Name State
Last Name Zip
Title Email