Search FCW


Subscribe Now!
Table of Contents
Sprint
Business
BPM
CXOs
Columns
Columnists
Defense
E-Government
Elections 2008
Enterprise Architecture
Funding
Homeland Security
Health IT
IPv6
LOB
Management
Procurement
Privacy
Policy
Program Management
State and Local
Security
Technology
Telework
Training and Certification
Workforce

More Topics
resourcecenter
Home
Letters to the Editor
Current Issue/Download
Print/Online Archives
Editorial Calendar
researchstore
resourcecenter
Communications for Continuity Operations

Oracle Resource Center
NEW! Transforming Data Center
Managed Services
Service Oriented Architecture
Training & Simulation
Networking Communications
Security Directives and Compliance
Data Center Virtualization
Air Force ELSG Contract Guide

More >>



Latest News
ADVERTISEMENT





 

5 reasons thin clients deserve a fresh look

Cost savings, security and technology advances make approach more viable

By John Moore
Published on January 22, 2007

Comment

Click here to comment on this article


Related story links

Web extra: When thin isn’t in

Can you be too thin?

Army desktops could go thin

Thin-client desktops: Not defunct yet


Newsletters

You might also be interested in these FCW newsletters:

Daily

To learn more, click here.


Thin-client computing has been around for years, and at various times, vendors have declared that thin is in.

The thin-client approach involves diskless desktop computers that pass off most processing and administrative chores to a centralized server. The underlying premise of thin clients is that fewer moving parts and no local storage reduce administrative costs and boost security.

Many organizations have bought into the technology, but performance concerns and budget issues have kept others on the sidelines. Thin-client computing may now deserve another look, given proven financial benefits, continuing security concerns and recent technology twists.

1. The proof is in: Running thin clients can cost less
Lower operating costs have been a central selling point for thin clients since they arrived on the market. With years of use behind it, the technology has the track record to prove its marketing pitch.

York County, Pa., for example, saves $80,000 annually because it uses thin-client technology. The deployment consists of Citrix Technology’s Citrix Presentation Server software and Hewlett-Packard’s  Compaq t5000 thin-client devices. The county first deployed thin-client technology in 2001.

“We’ve realized a huge savings through the course of our deployment of thin clients,” said Jeffery Shiflett, York County’s assistant director of information technologies.

He said the county, which previously used desktops, has saved on technology upgrades and ongoing support costs. Because there’s less to break, there’s also less to repair, Shiflett said. He said the organization’s thin-client investment paid for itself in less than two years.

But don’t expect to save much on the initial hardware investment. In some cases, the price of a thin client isn’t much different from a desktop PC’s.

“The greatest savings comes from the reduction in touch labor required for administration and troubleshooting,” said Col. Rusty Lingenfelter, chief of the Information Infrastructure Integration Division in the Army Chief Information Officer’s Office.

The Army has used thin-client solutions to access multiple classified networks from one machine, Lingenfelter said. Traditionally, Army users who frequently accessed several networks needed to have multiple PCs on their desks.


upcoming event

Green Computing Summit, Ronald Reagan Building, Washington, DC
December 2 - December 3, 2008

Trusted Internet Connection and the Comprehensive National Cyber Security Initiative, The Willard Intercontinental Hotel, Washington, DC
December 4, 2008


 

head
fcw
issue
First Name State
Last Name Zip
Title Email