Search FCW


Subscribe Now!
Table of Contents
Sprint
Business
BPM
CXOs
Columns
Columnists
Defense
E-Government
Elections 2008
Enterprise Architecture
Funding
Homeland Security
Health IT
IPv6
LOB
Management
Procurement
Privacy
Policy
Program Management
State and Local
Security
Technology
Telework
Training and Certification
Workforce

More Topics
resourcecenter
Home
Letters to the Editor
Current Issue/Download
Print/Online Archives
Editorial Calendar
researchstore
resourcecenter
Communications for Continuity Operations

Oracle Resource Center
Networking Communications
Security Directives and Compliance
Data Center Virtualization
Air Force ELSG Contract Guide
Security Management
DOD and Security Guide
Networx Contract Guide
SEWP IV Contract Guide
Priority Report: Virtualization
Priority Report: Networking Services

More >>



Latest News
ADVERTISEMENT





 

Lawmakers urged to consider expanded mandate for e-filing

GAO points to states’ success with mandatory e-filing

By Matthew Weigelt
Published on December 4, 2006

Comment

Click here to comment on this article


Related story links

Government Accountability Office report on e-filing

More people should e-file, Senate panel says

GE touts benefits of corporate e-filing

IRS eases e-filing rules


Newsletters

You might also be interested in these FCW newsletters:

Daily

To learn more, click here.


The Internal Revenue Service could sharply reduce its tax processing costs if paid tax preparers had to file returns electronically. But not all of them would welcome such a mandate, tax industry observers say.

The Government Accountability Office has recommended that lawmakers require paid tax preparers to file their clients’ tax returns electronically. If they electronically filed 90 percent of those returns, the government would save about $68 million a year on tax processing, according to a report GAO released in November. The “IRS is missing an opportunity to generate additional savings,” wrote GAO.

Cindy Hockenberry, a tax information analyst at the National Association of Tax Professionals, said she recognizes the benefits of mandatory e-filing, which include more accurate tax returns and faster tax refunds.

But she added that commercial tax preparers worry that the cost of upgrading their computer systems and business processes for e-filing would lower their profits and be too time-consuming.

To become authorized providers, tax preparers would need to submit formal applications and undergo fingerprint and background checks. “That’s a lot of hoops to jump through,” Hockenberry said.

Jack Green, a certified public accountant in Toccoa, Ga., said e-filing is good for his clients, but it could create an extra burden for him. But some small-business preparers say they wouldn’t object to mandatory e-filing. Richard Behm, president of American Tax Services and a tax practitioner, said most of his clients appreciate how quickly their refunds arrive when the company files tax forms electronically.

To support its recommendation for mandatory e-filing, GAO cited
successful state mandates and a federal e-file requirement for large corporations and nonprofit organizations.

State mandates increased e-filing by paid tax preparers in eight of the nine states with the requirement. Wisconsin’s mandatory e-file law in 2002 produced more than a 29 percent increase in e-filing compared with the previous year, GAO said.

Mandatory e-filing for corporations and nonprofit organizations has also worked, IRS Commissioner Mark Everson said in a speech last month.
The decision on whether to expand mandatory e-filing to commercial tax preparers rests with lawmakers. GAO said the IRS lacks authority to issue such a mandate.


upcoming event

Transition 2009, Four Points Sheraton, Washington, DC
October 15, 2008

GCN Awards Gala, Hilton Washington in Washington, D.C.
October 22, 2008


 

head
fcw
issue
First Name State
Last Name Zip
Title Email