Search FCW


Subscribe Now!
Table of Contents
Sprint
Business
BPM
CXOs
Columns
Columnists
Defense
E-Government
Elections 2008
Enterprise Architecture
Funding
Homeland Security
Health IT
IPv6
LOB
Management
Procurement
Privacy
Policy
Program Management
State and Local
Security
Technology
Telework
Training and Certification
Workforce

More Topics
resourcecenter
Home
Letters to the Editor
Current Issue/Download
Print/Online Archives
Editorial Calendar
researchstore
resourcecenter
Communications for Continuity Operations

Oracle Resource Center
NEW! Transforming Data Center
Managed Services
Service Oriented Architecture
Training & Simulation
Networking Communications
Security Directives and Compliance
Data Center Virtualization
Air Force ELSG Contract Guide

More >>



Latest News
ADVERTISEMENT





 

GAO: Feds still lack security research agenda

By John Monroe
Published on November 1, 2006

Comment

Click here to comment on this article


Related story links

Cyber Storm finds weaknesses

Garcia welcomed as cyber czar

Innovative security tech bubbles up


Newsletters

You might also be interested in these FCW newsletters:

Daily

To learn more, click here.


The federal government does a lot of research and development work in information security, but its efforts still lack a coherent focus, according to a Government Accountability Office report. The primary problem is that the government has not developed an overarching R&D agenda, the report states. Numerous agencies are actively researching security issues, but they are not coordinating their work. Those agencies also need to do a better job of sharing information about their research with one another and with industry, according to GAO. "Until these issues are addressed, federal research for cybersecurity and information assurance may not keep pace with the increasing number of threats and vulnerabilities," GAO auditors wrote in the cover letter to their report, provided to Rep. Tom Davis (R-Va.), chairman of the House Government Reform Committee. The idea of a research agenda stems from the National Strategy to Secure Cyberspace, published in 2003. According to that report, the federal government should develop a road map for addressing identified gaps in security research. The 2003 report recommends looking at research requirements in three segments: near term (one to three years), midterm (three to five years) and long term (five years or more). GAO auditors are not so concerned about near-term efforts. But the lack of an agenda "increase[s] the risk that mid- and longer-term research priorities may not be achieved," the GAO report states. GAO says agencies have made some progress in recent years. For example, they created an interagency working group to focus on security research and published a federal plan for guiding their research. But that plan falls short of being the comprehensive agenda the government requires, auditors concluded. The agenda should outline specific milestones for conducting research, specify goals and measures for evaluating that work, and assign responsibilities for carrying it out. GAO recommends that the director of the Office of Science and Technology Policy establish a timeline for developing such an agenda.

upcoming event

Program Management Summit 2008, Ronald Reagan Building, Washington, DC
November 18 - November 19, 2008

Defense and Intelligence Solutions for Business Transformation-DC, Grand Hyatt, Washington, D.C.
November 18, 2008

Building Sustainable Business Models in a Green World, The Willard Hotel 1401 PA Ave., NW Washington, DC
November 19, 2008, 8:00 AM - 10:00 AM

Security 2008, Ronald Reagan Building, Washington, DC
November 20 - November 21, 2008


 

head
fcw
issue
First Name State
Last Name Zip
Title Email