Search FCW


Subscribe Now!
Table of Contents
Sprint
Business
BPM
CXOs
Columns
Columnists
Defense
E-Government
Elections 2008
Enterprise Architecture
Funding
Homeland Security
Health IT
IPv6
LOB
Management
Procurement
Privacy
Policy
Program Management
State and Local
Security
Technology
Telework
Training and Certification
Workforce

More Topics
resourcecenter
Home
Letters to the Editor
Current Issue/Download
Print/Online Archives
Editorial Calendar
researchstore
resourcecenter
Communications for Continuity Operations

Oracle Resource Center
NEW! Transforming Data Center
Managed Services
Service Oriented Architecture
Training & Simulation
Networking Communications
Security Directives and Compliance
Data Center Virtualization
Air Force ELSG Contract Guide

More >>



Latest News
ADVERTISEMENT





 

Army, FCS integrator relationship troubles GAO

By Sebastian Sprenger
Published on June 6, 2007

Comment

Click here to comment on this article


Related story links

Role of Lead Systems Integrator on Future Combat Systems Program Poses Oversight Challenges (.pdf)

Senators call for management reforms at DOD


Newsletters

You might also be interested in these FCW newsletters:

Daily

To learn more, click here.


Defense Secretary Robert Gates should play a greater role in overseeing the development of the Army’s Future Combat Systems (FCS) program, and Pentagon leaders should ask themselves what lessons can be learned from running complex weapons programs with the help of a large defense contractor, according to a Government Accountability Office report released today.

The Army picked Boeing as a lead systems integrator to help develop FCS in 2003, arguing that the service lacks the staff and technical expertise to manage the multibillion-dollar program on its own.

As envisioned by the Army, FCS encompasses a family of manned and unmanned vehicles and systems connected by an advanced network. Since its inception, the program has become synonymous with the Army’s effort to transform into a modular, more agile force.

In recent years, schedule slips and burgeoning cost estimates have plagued the program.

According to GAO, the close working relationship between the Army and Boeing in managing FCS makes government oversight for the program difficult. “Depending on the closeness of the working relationship, the government can become increasingly vested in the results of shared decisions and runs the risk of being less able to provide oversight...especially when the government is disadvantaged in terms of workforce and skills,” the auditors wrote.

In his response on a draft version of the GAO report, a Pentagon official called the Army’s relationship with Boeing “typical of a prime contract for a major system.”

Defense officials concurred with GAO’s recommendation that the Office of the Secretary of Defense assert independent markers to judge program progress in the areas of cost, technological maturity, design maturity and production maturity, saying Pentagon acquisition policies are already being reworked to that effect.

In addition, they wrote, members of the high-powered Defense Acquisition Board are expected to deliberate a number of critical assessments to gauge FCS progress. These include a technology readiness assessment, an independent cost estimate and a system engineering assessment, according to the Pentagon’s written response to the GAO report.

Kenneth Krieg, outgoing undersecretary of Defense for acquisition, logistics and technology, is chairman of the Defense Acquisition Board. The panel’s next meeting on FCS is scheduled for June 13.



upcoming event

Program Management Summit 2008, Ronald Reagan Building, Washington, DC
November 18 - November 19, 2008

Defense and Intelligence Solutions for Business Transformation-DC, Grand Hyatt, Washington, D.C.
November 18, 2008

Building Sustainable Business Models in a Green World, The Willard Hotel 1401 PA Ave., NW Washington, DC
November 19, 2008, 8:00 AM - 10:00 AM

Security 2008, Ronald Reagan Building, Washington, DC
November 20 - November 21, 2008


 

head
fcw
issue
First Name State
Last Name Zip
Title Email