Search FCW


Subscribe Now!
Table of Contents
Sprint
Business
BPM
CXOs
Columns
Columnists
Defense
E-Government
Elections 2008
Enterprise Architecture
Funding
Homeland Security
Health IT
IPv6
LOB
Management
Procurement
Privacy
Policy
Program Management
State and Local
Security
Technology
Telework
Training and Certification
Workforce

More Topics
resourcecenter
Home
Letters to the Editor
Current Issue/Download
Print/Online Archives
Editorial Calendar
researchstore
resourcecenter
Communications for Continuity Operations

Oracle Resource Center
Networking Communications
Security Directives and Compliance
Data Center Virtualization
Air Force ELSG Contract Guide
Security Management
DOD and Security Guide
Networx Contract Guide
SEWP IV Contract Guide
Priority Report: Virtualization
Priority Report: Networking Services

More >>



Latest News
ADVERTISEMENT





 

GAO: Tighten voting system standards

By John Moore
Published on April 19, 2007

Comment

Click here to comment on this article


Related story links

Holt renews call for e-voting law

Testimony Before the Subcommittee on Information Policy, Census, and National Archives, House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform


Newsletters

You might also be interested in these FCW newsletters:

Daily

To learn more, click here.


The nation’s electronic voting systems are in need of comprehensive technology standards, according to a government auditor.

In House testimony this week, Randolph Hite, director of information technology architecture and systems issues at the Government Accountability Office, called for the Election Assistance Commission to beef up standards for voting systems. The commission was established under the Help America Vote Act of 2002 to promote election reform.

Hite cited some improvement in standards and noted that the commission’s Voluntary Voting System Guidelines address security gaps in previous standards. Those guidelines cover system requirements, performance characteristics, and test and evaluation criteria for national certification of voting systems.

But the commission’s guidelines, which go into effect in December 2007, do not comprehensively address voting technology issues, Hite said. He added that the guidelines fail to address commercial hardware and software that may be used in voting systems with no modification.

In addition, Hite pointed out that a number of state and local authorities aren’t using the current voting system benchmark –- a set of voluntary standards the Federal Election Commission devised in 1990 and revised in 2002. As of the 2006 general election, a substantial number of states and jurisdictions had yet to adopt those federal standards, he said.

“The [Election Assistance Commission] needs to move swiftly to strengthen the voting system standards and the testing associated with enforcing them,” Hite said. “However, the EAC alone cannot ensure that electronic voting system challenges are effectively addressed. State and local governments must also do their parts.”

Hite said the commission agreed with GAO’s recommendation but told the agency that it faces resource constraints that limit its ability to perform its duties.



upcoming event

Transition 2009, Four Points Sheraton, Washington, DC
October 15, 2008

GCN Awards Gala, Hilton Washington in Washington, D.C.
October 22, 2008


 

head
fcw
issue
First Name State
Last Name Zip
Title Email